During a press interaction at Joint Base Andrews, former President Donald Trump encountered an unexpected moment when a reporter's microphone accidentally struck him in the face. The incident occurred as Trump was engaging with the media, discussing various topics of national interest.

As the microphone made contact, Trump momentarily paused and then fixed his gaze on the reporter responsible. With his characteristic wit, he remarked, "She just became a big story tonight." His response elicited laughter from those present, diffusing any potential tension from the situation.

The moment quickly gained traction on social media, with users sharing clips and commenting on Trump's reaction. Some found his quip humorous and reflective of his ability to handle unexpected situations with a sense of humor, while others debated the implications of the incident.

Despite the brief interruption, Trump continued addressing the press, reaffirming his stance on key issues. The incident served as a lighthearted yet memorable moment in his ongoing public appearances.

 In a striking statement, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio revealed that President Donald Trump has presented his argument for why he believes Canada would benefit from joining the United States as the 51st state.

Trump's Argument

According to Rubio, Trump contends that Canada—with its robust economy, advanced educational system, and abundant natural resources—could significantly enhance the economic strength and national security of the United States if it were to integrate. Trump argues that a closer bond between the two nations could bolster bilateral trade, streamline defense cooperation, and solidify a strategic alliance in North America.

Reactions from Experts and Political Observers

Political analysts and experts have mixed reactions to Trump’s proposal. While some see the idea as a bold and provocative strategy aimed at energizing his base, others believe it is more of a symbolic gesture rather than a feasible political reality. Critics point out that Canada is a sovereign nation with its own cultural identity and political system, making any such merger a complicated and unlikely process. They note that such a shift would require extensive negotiations and a broad consensus from both Canadian citizens and their government.

Economic and Security Considerations

Supporters of Trump’s line of thinking highlight the potential economic benefits of a unified North American market. Canada is one of America’s largest trading partners, and closer economic ties could open new avenues for growth and development. However, experts caution that merging two distinct economies and political systems would involve intricate coordination and could face significant institutional and public resistance.

From a security perspective, a united front could potentially enhance the collective ability of the two nations to counter global threats, including terrorism and transnational crime. Nonetheless, the issue of national sovereignty remains a critical hurdle that could complicate any such union.

Conclusion

While Trump’s suggestion that Canada should become the 51st state has ignited debate and attracted significant attention, it remains largely symbolic. The proposal raises important questions about the balance between economic integration and national sovereignty, as well as the practicality of such a political merger. For now, both the United States and Canada continue to maintain a strong strategic partnership, built on shared economic interests and mutual security concerns, without any immediate plans for formal integration.

 In an exclusive interview on “The Ingraham Angle,” Vice President JD Vance issued a stark warning about the future of Europe. According to Vance, the continent is at risk of engaging in civilizational suicide—a bold statement that underscores the potential for self-inflicted decline if decisive reforms and strategic actions are not taken.

Concerns Over Europe’s Future

During the interview, Vance highlighted several critical issues facing Europe today:

• Political Fragmentation: Vance warned that European nations are increasingly fragmented, resulting in weak domestic policies and an inability to unite in addressing shared challenges. This division could severely hamper the continent’s ability to respond effectively to global pressures.
• Cultural Crisis: He pointed to a growing crisis of values, noting that the fundamental principles of Western civilization are being questioned. The rise of populist and nationalist movements, in his view, threatens the core cultural tenets that have historically underpinned European society.
• Shifting International Relations: Vance also discussed the evolving relationship between the United States and European nations. He argued that inconsistencies in foreign policy and strategy could lead not only to regional instability in Europe but might also have broader implications for global security.

U.S.-European Relations in a Global Context

Vance emphasized the importance of a strong transatlantic alliance. Key points from his discussion include:

• Unified Foreign Policy: Both the U.S. and European nations need to coordinate more closely to address common threats such as economic instability, climate change, and emerging security challenges.
• Promotion of Democratic Values: Strengthening democratic institutions, individual freedoms, and the rule of law is essential. Vance warned that without a firm commitment to these principles, Europe risks further erosion of its social and political foundations.

Impact and Potential Solutions

The vice president’s remarks serve as both a critique of the current state of affairs and a call to action:

• Structural Reforms: Vance advocates for deep-seated reforms within European countries. By addressing past mistakes and modernizing internal policies, Europe might steer clear of the path toward self-destruction.
• Enhanced International Cooperation: Establishing a robust, united front with the United States and other strategic allies could be the key to overcoming today’s multifaceted challenges, potentially ushering in a new era of stability and growth for the continent.

Conclusion

JD Vance’s interview on “The Ingraham Angle” paints a sobering picture of Europe’s trajectory. His warning—that without significant reforms and reinforced alliances, Europe may be on a path to civilizational suicide—calls for urgent reflection and action. While the challenges are substantial, his remarks also suggest that a committed effort to unity and strategic cooperation could help reverse these worrying trends and secure a sustainable future for Europe.

President Trump is ramping up pressure on Panama over control of the Panama Canal, even going as far as to suggest the potential use of military force to prevent China from exerting dominance over the vital waterway.

According to an overnight report from the Daily Mail, two military sources have indicated that the US Southern Command "has developed an array of potential plans to ensure America has full access to the Panama Canal."

During a CNN panel discussion last night, Scott Jennings addressed this growing concern, laying out why it is crucial for Trump to take action against China’s influence in the region. Despite attempts by a panelist to trip him up on the issue, Jennings delivered a strong and informed response, clearly explaining China's activities in the canal and why they pose a strategic threat.

You know that the black panelist (don’t know his name) thought he was going to stump Jennings when he asked him about Chinese control of the Canal, but Jennings knocked that one out of the park. This is why he has become so popular, because he’s as sharp as a tack.

Watch the full exchange below:

Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.

This morning on Fox Business, Attorney General Pam Bondi revealed that they have arrested and charged a leftist who threw a Molotov cocktail at a Tesla dealership.

Bondi stated that the attacker could face up to 20 years in prison for this act of vandalism. She also emphasized that authorities are actively pursuing other individuals involved in the incident.

"They are targeting Tesla dealerships, the stations where you charge a Tesla. They're vandalizing cars. I have already directed an investigation be opened to see, how is this being funded? Who is behind this, doing this?" Bondi said.

"We have someone in jail right now from one of the dealerships. They threw a Molotov cocktail through a dealership. They're looking at up to 20 years in prison," Bondi revealed.

"So if you're going to touch a Tesla, go to a dealership, do anything – you better watch out, because we're coming after you," the AG continued. "And if you're funding this, we're coming after you. We're going to find out who you are."

Watch the video:
nam

We will continue to provide updates on this developing story.

 On a recent episode of Deadline White House, Nicolle Wallace didn’t hold back in her criticism of Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s responses to questions on tariffs. Joined by Annie Lowrey of The Atlantic, former Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill, and Canadian business journalist Amanda Lang, Wallace dissected the Trump administration’s apparent lack of grasp on tariff policy and its broader economic implications.

Wallace summarized the exchange with a searing remark: “She’s either tragically uniformed, or lying,” referring to Leavitt’s answers that failed to address the real issues behind the tariffs. According to Wallace, Leavitt’s responses—and by extension, the economic policies of her bosses—are not only out of touch with global trade realities but are also actively spooking stock markets and undermining American confidence in the economy.

The panel highlighted several concerns:

• Economic Mismanagement: Lowrey, McCaskill, and Lang argued that the administration’s approach to tariffs seems more politically motivated than rooted in sound economic strategy. This disconnect, they warned, could fuel market volatility and damage long-term economic stability.
• Global Trade Risks: McCaskill noted that the administration’s missteps risk damaging the United States’ standing in international trade, while Lang pointed out that inconsistent tariff policies are already rattling markets in Canada and beyond.
• Eroding Trust: The panel underscored that Leavitt’s evasive and contradictory responses do little to instill confidence among investors or the public. Instead, they contribute to a growing narrative that the current economic policies are not being managed with the necessary expertise or transparency.

Wallace and her colleagues called on the administration to reexamine its tariff strategy and communicate more clearly with both the markets and American citizens. They argued that in times of global economic uncertainty, clear and informed policy is crucial—not only to maintain stability but also to protect the nation’s credibility on the world stage.

As the debate over tariff policy intensifies, the comments from Deadline White House serve as a stark reminder: without coherent economic leadership, the repercussions could extend far beyond temporary market jitters, threatening the broader financial well-being of the country.

 No More Excuses: Sanders Slams Trumpism and Billionaire Excess

Senator Bernie Sanders delivered a pointed rebuke to the current state of American politics, declaring that “People are sick and tired of Trumpism. Nobody thinks it's okay for the richest guy in the world to do what he is doing.” In a recent statement, Sanders emphasized that the nation’s frustration isn’t limited to one individual—it’s about a system that allows unchecked power and wealth to dictate policy at the expense of ordinary Americans.

A Nation Fed Up

Sanders’ remarks come amid growing discontent among voters who feel that the interests of the ultra-wealthy are prioritized over those of working families. “We’re at a tipping point,” he noted, adding that the policies and behavior of figures like Donald Trump and Elon Musk have pushed everyday Americans to their limits. According to Sanders, the repeated disregard for democratic norms and economic fairness is no longer acceptable.

The Cost of Concentrated Power

In his criticism, Sanders highlighted how Trumpism, characterized by divisive rhetoric and policies favoring the rich, has eroded trust in the political system. He argued that when the richest individuals act without accountability, it undermines the democratic principles that are supposed to ensure equal opportunity and justice for all. “When you see such blatant abuse of power and wealth, it’s a wake-up call for the country,” Sanders asserted.

A Call for Systemic Change

Beyond condemning individual actions, Sanders called for a broader systemic change. He urged policymakers to reexamine how power and resources are distributed in America. “This isn’t just about one man or one billionaire,” he said. “It’s about transforming a system that rewards the concentration of wealth and leaves the majority of people behind.”

Looking Ahead

As the debate over economic justice and democratic integrity intensifies, Senator Sanders’ message resonates with many Americans who demand accountability. His call to action is clear: no one should have the power to shape our nation’s future solely on the basis of wealth and influence. For Sanders, the time has come to put people first and reclaim a system that works for everyone, not just the elite.

Sanders’ bold statement underscores a growing movement across the country—a movement determined to stand up against the excesses of Trumpism and billionaire dominance, and to rebuild a political system that truly serves the interests of the people.

 Dem Rep. Jayapal: Democrats Must Stand Against "Bad" Government Funding Bill

House Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal warned on CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that the harm from the GOP’s funding bill is “far worse” than a potential government shutdown. In a candid interview, Jayapal argued that while a shutdown would cause temporary disruptions, accepting the bill would lead to lasting damage by undermining critical public services and congressional oversight.

A Costly Trade-Off

According to Jayapal, the funding bill—pushed by Republicans as a stopgap measure to keep the government running—is deeply flawed. “A government shutdown may hurt in the short term, but the damage from this bill would be far more devastating for our country in the long run,” she asserted. She emphasized that the bill grants the executive branch excessive discretion over federal spending, effectively turning public funds into a “blank check” without proper safeguards.

Undermining Congressional Authority

Jayapal explained that the bill, which cuts non-defense discretionary spending while increasing military and border enforcement funding, shifts the balance of power in Washington. “When Congress relinquishes its authority to set spending priorities, we risk eroding the very checks and balances that protect the American people,” she said. The congresswoman warned that such a move could have ripple effects across essential programs like healthcare, education, and community services, leaving vulnerable communities at risk.

A Call for Unity and Better Solutions

Highlighting the importance of a united front, Jayapal urged her Democratic colleagues to reject the GOP proposal outright. “We must stand together and say no to a bill that sacrifices our nation’s long-term well-being for short-term political convenience,” she declared. Instead of settling for a measure that merely averts a shutdown, Jayapal and other progressive leaders are calling for a comprehensive, bipartisan funding solution that upholds transparency and protects vital government services.

Looking Ahead

As the debate over federal funding intensifies, Jayapal’s remarks serve as a stark reminder of the potential costs of compromise. While the pressure to avoid a shutdown remains high, the congresswoman insists that Democrats cannot trade off essential oversight and service protection for temporary relief. “The price we pay by accepting this bill will be measured not in days, but in years of diminished accountability and support for the people,” she warned.

In these challenging times, Rep. Jayapal’s stance underscores a broader Democratic commitment to preserving not only government functionality but also the principles of responsible fiscal management and public accountability.

 Rep. Turner: Preservation of Ukraine Remains Our Ultimate Goal

In a recent statement, Representative Turner made it clear that the preservation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and democratic institutions is not just a policy objective—it is the ultimate goal. Speaking at a press briefing, Turner emphasized that amid mounting external pressures and ongoing conflicts, ensuring Ukraine’s survival as an independent nation is critical for both regional stability and the broader international order.

A Firm Commitment to Democracy

Rep. Turner stated, "Our unwavering support for Ukraine reflects our commitment to defending democratic values against those who seek to undermine them." He pointed out that Ukraine’s resilience in the face of aggression serves as a powerful example for the world, underscoring why the United States and its allies must work together to protect its freedom and territorial integrity.

Beyond Short-Term Fixes

Turner criticized any approach that prioritizes temporary measures over long-term security. "While immediate relief is important, our strategies must focus on preserving Ukraine’s future as a beacon of democracy," he declared. Turner warned that neglecting the long-term consequences could embolden adversaries and destabilize the region further.

A Call for International Unity

Highlighting the necessity of global cooperation, Turner urged Congress and international partners to invest in comprehensive support measures—diplomatic, economic, and military—that guarantee Ukraine’s endurance. "The preservation of Ukraine is not a symbolic gesture; it is a strategic imperative," he remarked. Turner called for a united response to counter aggression and safeguard not only Ukraine but the democratic norms that underpin international peace and security.

Looking Ahead

As debates over foreign aid and security commitments continue in Washington, Rep. Turner’s remarks serve as a rallying cry for decisive action. His message is clear: preserving Ukraine’s sovereignty is essential to prevent further destabilization in Eastern Europe and to uphold the values that form the foundation of the international community.

With bipartisan support increasingly seen as vital in confronting emerging global challenges, Rep. Turner’s vision stresses that safeguarding Ukraine is about more than politics—it is about securing a future where democracy thrives against all odds.

 Rep. Ocasio-Cortez: GOP Funding Bill is Bad for the Country

In a passionate speech on the House floor, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) warned that the Republican funding bill poses a serious threat to the nation’s long-term interests. Although the bill is designed as a stopgap measure to prevent a government shutdown, AOC argues that its underlying provisions could have far-reaching negative consequences.

A Temporary Fix with Lasting Consequences

AOC contends that while the bill may temporarily keep the government open, it does so at a steep price. “This isn’t just about avoiding a shutdown,” she said. “It’s about handing over unchecked power to the executive branch.” According to her, the bill, which was drafted without meaningful input from Democrats, undermines the essential role of Congress in overseeing federal spending.

Erosion of Congressional Oversight

One of AOC’s primary concerns is that the funding measure grants excessive discretion to the president and his administration. By stripping away many of the detailed spending directives that Congress typically provides, the bill effectively turns federal funding into a “blank check.” This, she warns, could allow for significant cuts to essential programs without proper accountability, ultimately eroding the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches.

Impact on Essential Programs

Beyond the issue of oversight, AOC highlights the direct impact the bill could have on American communities. The proposed legislation includes substantial cuts to non-defense discretionary spending—a category that funds critical social services like healthcare, education, and community programs. “If we let this bill pass, we are not only sacrificing transparency, we are also risking the well-being of millions of Americans who depend on these services,” AOC stressed.

A Call for a Comprehensive Approach

While many lawmakers face the tough choice between risking a shutdown or passing a bill with significant drawbacks, AOC is urging Congress to pursue a more comprehensive and bipartisan solution. She believes that a clean continuing resolution, one that preserves detailed spending guidance and maintains proper checks on executive power, is essential for protecting the country’s long-term fiscal health.

Conclusion

In the heated debate over federal funding, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez’s remarks serve as a stark reminder of the potential costs of short-term fixes. While avoiding a government shutdown is undoubtedly important, AOC warns that accepting a flawed funding bill could set a dangerous precedent—one that may weaken Congressional authority and undermine essential public services for years to come.

RFK Jr.: Trump Wants ‘Radical Transparency’ on Food Safety & Vaccine Freedom

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.), a well-known environmental activist and attorney, has been vocal about his concerns regarding food safety and vaccine policies. Recently, he has found an unexpected ally in former President Donald Trump, who has expressed support for greater transparency in these areas.

RFK Jr.'s Views on Food Safety and Vaccine Freedom

RFK Jr. has long criticized the presence of harmful additives in food and the use of fluoride in drinking water, arguing that these practices pose serious health risks. He has also been critical of regulatory agencies, claiming they fail to protect public health effectively. His push for reforms aims to increase transparency and accountability within these institutions.

On the issue of vaccines, RFK Jr. has been a controversial figure, questioning the safety of certain vaccines and advocating for further research. While mainstream scientific studies have repeatedly debunked claims linking vaccines to autism, he continues to call for more transparency in vaccine programs and regulatory processes.

Trump’s Support for ‘Radical Transparency’

Donald Trump has recently endorsed the idea of "radical transparency" in food safety and vaccine policies, aligning with RFK Jr.’s concerns. This move is seen as part of his broader effort to appeal to voters who are skeptical of government oversight in public health matters.

Trump has also ordered the declassification of documents related to historical government cover-ups, including those concerning the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr. This signals his commitment to setting new standards for transparency.

RFK Jr.'s rumored role in a potential Trump administration—possibly as Secretary of Health and Human Services—has sparked debate. Supporters argue that his involvement could bring much-needed reform, while critics fear his controversial stance on vaccines could undermine public health initiatives.

Public Reaction and Future Prospects

The possibility of RFK Jr. holding a key role in Trump’s administration has elicited mixed reactions. Many public health experts worry that his vaccine skepticism could weaken national immunization programs. However, his supporters believe that his push for transparency and reform could lead to positive changes in the healthcare system.

If confirmed for a leadership role, RFK Jr. will face the challenge of balancing reform efforts while maintaining public trust in health institutions. His collaboration with Trump could reshape U.S. food safety and vaccine policies, but it also raises critical questions about the long-term impact on public health and scientific integrity.

 In a lively discussion over tariffs last night, Kevin O’Leary – better known as Mr. Wonderful – didn’t hold back his thoughts on CNN’s Abby Phillip. During the exchange, O’Leary remarked, “I know you don’t like Trump’s style – you haven’t liked it for 12 years,” addressing what he perceives as Phillip’s long-standing criticism of the former president’s approach.

Abby Phillip had been objecting to the way Trump announces tariffs only to later pause them, a tactic that O’Leary quickly defended by declaring, “That’s negotiation!” His comments underscored his belief that such strategic pauses are part of an effective bargaining process.

This spirited debate highlights the ongoing media scrutiny of Trump’s methods, as well as the contrasting perspectives on his economic policies. For those interested in the full exchange and its nuances, be sure to watch the video below.

[Watch the full clip here]

This incident adds another chapter to the broader narrative of media personalities and political figures clashing over policy and style, with Mr. Wonderful standing firmly in support of Trump’s tactics.

 In a shocking display of misguided activism, leftist demonstrators stormed Trump Tower in New York City, demanding the release of pro-Hamas activist Mahmoud Khalil. The protest, filled with individuals carrying signs that read ‘Fight Nazis, Not Students,’ quickly turned chaotic as law enforcement intervened, leading to multiple arrests.

The irony is glaring: These protesters claim to oppose Nazis, yet they champion the cause of Hamas—a terrorist organization whose ideology and actions mirror the fascist brutality of the very groups they claim to oppose. By aligning with Hamas sympathizers, these radical leftists expose their own hypocrisy.

Videos from the scene show a disorganized mob chanting and disrupting public order inside the iconic Trump Tower. Security and police officers swiftly responded, arresting multiple individuals who refused to leave peacefully. The arrests highlight the increasing tension between law enforcement and radical leftist movements that appear to excuse and support extremist ideologies.

Mahmoud Khalil, the activist at the center of this uproar, has been linked to pro-Hamas rhetoric and activities, sparking controversy over his intentions and affiliations. The protestors’ demands for his release only further underscore the dangerous narrative that seeks to excuse or downplay Hamas’s violent and oppressive agenda.

This latest stunt is yet another example of the radical left’s willingness to side with dangerous extremists in the name of so-called ‘social justice.’ As the protests continue, it remains clear that law enforcement will not tolerate lawlessness, and the public is growing increasingly aware of the true nature of these activist movements.

 Nếu bạn muốn một ứng dụng AI tạo video mã nguồn mở, hoàn toàn miễn phí, thì dưới đây là một số lựa chọn tốt nhất hiện tại.

1. Stable Video Diffusion (SVD) – Stability AI

🔹 Mã nguồn mở (Open-source)
🔹 Miễn phí 100%, có thể chạy trên máy tính cá nhân (nếu có GPU mạnh).
🔹 Text-to-Video (tạo video từ mô tả văn bản).
🔹 Cần GPU NVIDIA mạnh (RTX 3090 trở lên).

📌 Cách cài đặt & chạy trên local:

• Clone repo: https://github.com/Stability-AI/Stable-Video-Diffusion
• Cài đặt Python, PyTorch, và chạy lệnh tạo video như tôi đã hướng dẫn ở trên.

💡 Phù hợp nếu: Bạn có GPU mạnh và muốn tự host AI video.

2. ModelScope T2V – Alibaba

🔹 Mã nguồn mở (Open-source)
🔹 Miễn phí 100%, có thể chạy trên máy local hoặc Google Colab.
🔹 Text-to-Video (tạo video từ mô tả văn bản).
🔹 Không cần GPU mạnh nếu dùng Google Colab.

📌 Repo GitHub: https://github.com/damo-vilab/modelscope

💡 Phù hợp nếu: Bạn không có GPU mạnh nhưng muốn chạy trên Colab hoặc máy local.

3. AnimateDiff – AI tạo chuyển động từ ảnh

🔹 Mã nguồn mở
🔹 Dùng Stable Diffusion để tạo ảnh động (ảnh tĩnh + motion AI)
🔹 Cần GPU mạnh (RTX 3060 trở lên)

📌 Repo GitHub: https://github.com/guoyww/AnimateDiff

💡 Phù hợp nếu: Bạn muốn tạo video hoạt hình hoặc motion từ ảnh tĩnh.

4. Deforum Stable Diffusion – AI tạo video từ ảnh

🔹 Mã nguồn mở
🔹 Dùng Stable Diffusion để tạo video từ loạt ảnh (frame-by-frame)
🔹 Tạo video dạng hoạt hình, chuyển động mượt
🔹 Hỗ trợ chạy trên máy tính cá nhân hoặc Google Colab

📌 Repo GitHub: https://github.com/deforum-art/sd-1.5-deforum

💡 Phù hợp nếu: Bạn muốn tạo video bằng cách kết hợp AI vẽ ảnh + ghép thành video.

5. Pix2Video – AI biến ảnh tĩnh thành video ngắn

🔹 Mã nguồn mở
🔹 Nhận đầu vào là một hình ảnh, tạo video động từ hình đó
🔹 Dựa trên công nghệ Stable Diffusion

📌 Repo GitHub: https://github.com/Pix2Video/Pix2Video

💡 Phù hợp nếu: Bạn muốn AI tự động làm ảnh động thành video.

So sánh nhanh các mô hình AI tạo video mã nguồn mở

🔥 Bạn muốn tôi hướng dẫn cài đặt mô hình nào chi tiết hơn? 🚀

 DeepSeek R1 là một mô hình AI mã nguồn mở mạnh mẽ, nhưng nó chủ yếu tập trung vào xử lý ngôn ngữ tự nhiên (NLP), không phải tạo video. Để chạy các ứng dụng tạo video từ AI trên máy local, bạn sẽ cần một mô hình hỗ trợ tạo video (text-to-video), chẳng hạn như:

1. Các mô hình AI tạo video có thể chạy local

✅ Stable Video Diffusion (của Stability AI)

• Mở mã nguồn, có thể chạy trên máy cục bộ.
• Cần GPU mạnh (RTX 3090 trở lên khuyến nghị).

✅ ModelScope T2V (Text-to-Video của Alibaba)

• Miễn phí, có thể chạy trên máy local.
• Hỗ trợ tạo video từ mô tả văn bản nhưng cần xử lý thêm.

✅ AnimateDiff (AI tạo chuyển động từ ảnh tĩnh)

• Có thể kết hợp với Stable Diffusion để tạo video hoạt hình.

2. DeepSeek R1 có hỗ trợ không?

🔸 DeepSeek R1 có thể giúp tạo nội dung mô tả video, viết kịch bản, hoặc hỗ trợ lệnh cho các mô hình video, nhưng không trực tiếp tạo video.
🔸 Nếu bạn muốn chạy AI video trên máy local, bạn nên dùng Stable Video Diffusion hoặc ModelScope T2V thay vì DeepSeek R1.

Bạn có muốn tôi hướng dẫn cách cài đặt và chạy mô hình AI tạo video trên máy local không? 🚀

In a video that’s rapidly circulating online, President Trump delivered a characteristically sharp response after a Washington Post reporter attempted to bait him with a question about Russia “disrespecting” him. What followed was a long, wide-ranging set of remarks covering everything from media tactics to international affairs and domestic issues.

A Bait Question and a Quick Rebuff

The exchange began when a reporter from The Washington Post posed a question that appeared designed to trap the President into making a controversial statement about Russia. Trump immediately found the question peculiar. Instead of engaging directly, he asked the reporter which news organization he represented. When the reporter replied “The Washington Post,” Trump’s response was swift and humorous as he quickly moved on from what he described as a setup by “fake news.”

Extended Remarks: From Relationships to Rebuilding

Following the initial rebuke, Trump’s comments shifted into a broader discussion:

• On Personal and Diplomatic Relationships:
  “I have a very good relationship with President Xi. Very good,” Trump noted, hinting at potential future dealings with China. He mentioned dealing with “four different groups” and indicated that, although many have interests at stake, all four groups are “good” and it’s ultimately up to him to decide.

• On His Cabinet and Internal Affairs:
  Addressing questions about tensions within his administration, Trump reassured that there’s no serious discord among his cabinet. He praised his team as “special people” who have reached the highest levels of government. Even though he acknowledged that “hundreds of billions of dollars of waste, fraud and abuse” have been uncovered through questionable contracts, he maintained that these issues are more about fraudulent practices than personal conflicts—and overall, his cabinet gets along very well.

• On Operational Challenges and Quick Thinking:
  Shifting topics, Trump recounted an incident involving a small plane. “I think the Southwest pilot did a fantastic job last week when he lifted that plane off the air,” he said, emphasizing that immediate action saved the day. He even suggested that if the pilot had “put the brakes on” or if the license had been revoked for the plane that got in its way, the outcome might have been very different.

Global Affairs: Military Exercises, Negotiations, and the Ukraine Conflict

When asked about military exercises being conducted by Russia, China, and Iran, Trump’s response was unambiguous:

“No, not at all, not at all. Why? Because we're stronger than all of them. We have more power than all of them.”

He continued by boasting about his role in rebuilding the military—a task he claimed Biden failed to address. Trump expressed optimism about the future, particularly pointing to the negotiations in Saudi Arabia. He predicted that “very big things could happen this week,” even as he lamented the ongoing tragedy in Ukraine:

• On Ukraine and Peace:
  Trump noted the heavy toll of the conflict, stating that thousands of young soldiers and hundreds of civilians had already died. “It would have never happened if I was president,” he asserted, arguing that the current state of affairs—including events like the controversial October 7th and subsequent inflation and the problematic withdrawal from Afghanistan—would have been avoided under his leadership.

• On Lifting Intel Laws and Making Deals:
  When questioned about easing intelligence restrictions on Ukraine, Trump was measured yet resolute. He stressed that both Ukraine and Russia “don’t have the cards” and that making a deal to stop the killing is essential to ending what he described as a senseless war.

Economic Predictions and Concluding Remarks

Toward the close of his remarks, Trump turned to economic issues. He predicted that the country would soon be bringing in “hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs,” which would, in his view, result in booming job creation and the reopening of factories. “You're not going to know where to spend all that money,” he declared, his tone mixing certainty with optimism.

As he wrapped up, Trump thanked his audience and fielded what he called “a lot of good questions,” leaving viewers with the impression that his characteristic blend of humor, deflection, and assertive policy commentary was very much on display.

 

McLintock! (1963) là một bộ phim miền Tây hài hước của Hollywood, nổi bật với sự tham gia của huyền thoại John Wayne và nữ diễn viên tài năng Maureen O’Hara. Bộ phim không chỉ mang đến những pha hành động và cưỡi ngựa đặc trưng của thể loại Western mà còn có những khoảnh khắc hài hước và lãng mạn.

Nội dung phim

Nhân vật chính của bộ phim là George Washington "G.W." McLintock (John Wayne), một chủ trang trại giàu có và quyền lực sống tại vùng biên giới nước Mỹ. Ông là một người đàn ông mạnh mẽ, có uy tín nhưng cũng rất hào hiệp. Cuộc sống của McLintock trở nên rắc rối khi vợ cũ của ông, Katherine (Maureen O’Hara), trở về với ý định giành lại quyền nuôi con gái của họ, Becky (Stefanie Powers). Bên cạnh đó, McLintock còn phải đối mặt với những xung đột từ người da đỏ bản địa, những kẻ gian tham đất đai và cả những rắc rối trong cuộc sống gia đình.

Điểm đặc sắc của phim

Sự kết hợp hoàn hảo giữa hành động và hài hước

Không giống như nhiều bộ phim miền Tây chỉ tập trung vào bắn súng và đối đầu, McLintock! mang đến một câu chuyện đầy màu sắc với sự pha trộn giữa hành động, hài hước và cả những tình tiết lãng mạn. Những cuộc tranh cãi sôi nổi giữa John Wayne và Maureen O’Hara tạo nên những phân đoạn đầy sức sống, thể hiện sự ăn ý giữa hai diễn viên gạo cội này.

Cảnh đánh nhau mang tính biểu tượng

Một trong những cảnh nổi tiếng nhất của phim là trận ẩu đả vui nhộn bên bờ sông bùn, nơi gần như tất cả các nhân vật đều bị kéo vào một cuộc đánh nhau hỗn loạn. Cảnh này đã trở thành một trong những khoảnh khắc kinh điển nhất trong sự nghiệp của John Wayne.

Những thông điệp về công lý và gia đình

Dưới lớp vỏ hài hước và hành động, McLintock! cũng truyền tải những thông điệp về tình cảm gia đình, lòng trung thành và công lý. Nhân vật McLintock dù cứng rắn nhưng luôn bảo vệ những người thân yêu và đấu tranh chống lại sự bất công.

Di sản của McLintock!

Là một trong những bộ phim miền Tây được yêu thích nhất của John Wayne, McLintock! không chỉ thành công về mặt thương mại mà còn trở thành một phần quan trọng trong bộ sưu tập phim cao bồi kinh điển. Với diễn xuất mạnh mẽ của John Wayne và Maureen O’Hara, cùng với sự kết hợp giữa hành động và hài hước, bộ phim vẫn được khán giả yêu thích cho đến ngày nay.

Nếu bạn là một fan của dòng phim Western hoặc muốn khám phá một góc nhìn vui nhộn hơn về miền Tây nước Mỹ, McLintock! chắc chắn là một tác phẩm không thể bỏ qua!

 Royal Wedding (1951) là một bộ phim nhạc kịch lãng mạn của Hollywood, nổi bật với sự tham gia của huyền thoại khiêu vũ Fred Astaire và nữ diễn viên tài năng Jane Powell. Được đạo diễn bởi Stanley Donen, bộ phim này không chỉ mang đến những màn trình diễn tuyệt vời mà còn ghi dấu ấn bởi câu chuyện hấp dẫn và âm nhạc lôi cuốn.

Nội dung phim

Bộ phim lấy bối cảnh tại London vào năm 1947, khi cả thành phố đang tràn ngập không khí hân hoan chào đón lễ cưới của Công chúa Elizabeth và Hoàng tử Philip. Hai anh em khiêu vũ nổi tiếng của Mỹ, Tom Bowen (Fred Astaire) và Ellen Bowen (Jane Powell), được mời đến Anh để biểu diễn. Trong thời gian ở đây, cả hai đều tìm thấy tình yêu của riêng mình: Tom phải lòng nữ quý tộc Anne Ashmond (Sarah Churchill), trong khi Ellen nảy sinh tình cảm với Lord John Brindale (Peter Lawford).

Điểm nhấn của phim

Màn khiêu vũ trên trần nhà

Một trong những cảnh ấn tượng nhất của Royal Wedding chính là cảnh Fred Astaire nhảy múa trên trần nhà. Hiệu ứng đặc biệt này được thực hiện bằng cách xoay tròn cả căn phòng cùng với máy quay, tạo ra ảo giác rằng Astaire thực sự đang đi trên tường và trần nhà. Đây được coi là một trong những khoảnh khắc mang tính biểu tượng trong lịch sử điện ảnh.

Âm nhạc và vũ đạo xuất sắc

Bộ phim có nhiều bài hát hay do Burton Lane sáng tác và Alan Jay Lerner viết lời, nổi bật là ca khúc Too Late Now – một bản ballad lãng mạn được đề cử giải Oscar. Ngoài ra, những màn khiêu vũ của Fred Astaire và Jane Powell mang đậm phong cách Broadway và swing, khiến khán giả không thể rời mắt.

Diễn xuất tuyệt vời của dàn diễn viên

Fred Astaire, với phong thái thanh lịch và kỹ thuật nhảy điêu luyện, tiếp tục khẳng định mình là một huyền thoại của dòng phim nhạc kịch. Jane Powell, với giọng hát soprano đầy nội lực, mang đến một màn trình diễn tươi sáng và cuốn hút. Sự kết hợp của hai ngôi sao này tạo nên sức hấp dẫn đặc biệt cho bộ phim.

Di sản của Royal Wedding

Mặc dù ra mắt từ năm 1951, Royal Wedding vẫn được xem là một trong những bộ phim nhạc kịch kinh điển của Hollywood. Cảnh nhảy trên trần nhà của Fred Astaire đã truyền cảm hứng cho nhiều thế hệ đạo diễn và biên đạo sau này, thậm chí còn được tái hiện trong nhiều tác phẩm điện ảnh hiện đại.

Bộ phim không chỉ mang đến những giây phút giải trí tuyệt vời mà còn là minh chứng cho sự sáng tạo và tài năng của các nghệ sĩ thời kỳ hoàng kim của Hollywood. Nếu bạn yêu thích những bộ phim nhạc kịch cổ điển, Royal Wedding chắc chắn là một tác phẩm không thể bỏ qua!

Welcome to Live Film 24/7 – your ultimate destination for all things live movie streaming! Our blog dives into the latest trends in round-the-clock film streaming, interactive viewing experiences, and global film community insights. Discover in-depth reviews, streaming tips, and breaking entertainment news that keep you connected to the world of cinema anytime, anywhere. Join us as we explore how technology is revolutionizing movie-watching and transforming live film experiences into an engaging, 24/7 lifestyle.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrived at the EU summit today with a message of gratitude and determination. Standing before a gathering of European leaders, he expressed heartfelt thanks for the unwavering support that Ukraine has received since the onset of the conflict.

In his remarks, Zelenskyy noted,

"It's great we are not alone. We are very thankful that we are not alone. And these are not just words. We feel it."

He continued by acknowledging the strong backing from Europe, saying that support had been evident "from the very beginning of the war and … during all this period and last week, you stayed with us." His words resonated deeply with the audience, as they highlighted not only the political and military assistance provided by EU countries but also the moral and emotional solidarity that has buoyed Ukraine during these challenging times.

Zelenskyy emphasized that the signal of support from European nations sends a powerful message to all Ukrainians – from the fighters on the frontlines to the civilians and families who endure the hardships of war. "It’s very important you sent a strong signal to Ukrainian people, to Ukrainian warriors, to civilians, to all our families," he stated.

The summit, held amid a rapidly shifting geopolitical landscape, serves as a critical forum for European leaders to coordinate strategies and bolster defenses in support of Ukraine. As discussions continue on enhancing regional security, Zelenskyy’s arrival and his message of solidarity underline the significance of collective action in the face of aggression.

By reaffirming that Ukraine is not isolated in its struggle, Zelenskyy’s remarks have reinvigorated hopes for a stronger, more united European front. The solidarity displayed today reinforces the belief that through mutual support and robust defense initiatives, a pathway toward lasting peace can eventually be forged.

As the summit progresses, the focus remains on translating this solidarity into concrete measures that not only defend Ukraine but also ensure the long-term security of Europe as a whole.

— End of Article —

 Representative Al Green has stated that he accepts the punishment after being removed from a joint session of Congress. He emphasized that his actions were necessary to speak out against the President’s plans to cut Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.

"I'll accept the punishment. It's worth it to let people know that there's some of us who are going to stand up against this president's desire to cut Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security," Rep. Green declared.

His actions have quickly drawn attention, sparking debate over the current administration's proposed cuts to social welfare programs. As these programs remain crucial for millions of Americans, discussions about their future continue to divide the political landscape.

Would you like to add any more details?

In a fresh twist to U.S.-Ukraine relations, the Trump administration has reportedly demanded that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy issue a public apology before moving ahead with a significant minerals deal. This condition was set following a heated Oval Office meeting between Zelenskyy and former President Donald Trump, as noted by Fox News’ Peter Doocy.

The dispute centers on strategic disagreements regarding Ukraine’s handling of crucial mineral resources—resources that are seen as vital for U.S. national security, particularly in areas like semiconductor production and defense technology. The administration’s insistence on a public apology has added another layer of complexity to an already tense relationship.

Adding to the controversy, former U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, weighed in during an appearance on The Faulkner Focus. Sondland, who played a notable role during Trump’s first impeachment inquiry, now faces renewed calls to resign amid the escalating fallout from the meeting.

Analysts suggest that the public apology requirement could further strain the diplomatic ties between Washington and Kyiv, as both nations balance economic interests, strategic resource management, and political optics. While some officials argue that securing access to Ukraine’s mineral wealth is crucial, others warn that setting such political preconditions may complicate broader international partnerships.

As the situation unfolds, observers are keeping a close eye on Zelenskyy’s next moves, uncertain whether he will concede to the demands or stand firm, potentially redefining the strategic relationship between the United States and Ukraine.

 https://dai.ly/x9fj8y4

Karoline Leavitt: America Is Open for Business Under Trump

In a recent appearance on the show “Kudlow,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt unpacked President Donald Trump’s economic policies, emphasizing that America is open for business under his leadership. Leavitt’s remarks offered insight into the administration’s commitment to fostering growth and streamlining regulations that promote a favorable business environment.

During her segment on “Kudlow,” Leavitt highlighted several key points of the President’s economic agenda. She noted that Trump’s policies are designed to drive investment, cut unnecessary red tape, and enhance America’s competitive edge in global markets. “Our focus is on creating an environment where businesses can thrive, innovate, and contribute to our nation’s economic growth,” Leavitt stated.

According to Leavitt, the administration’s policies have already begun to bear fruit by attracting investment and signaling confidence to both domestic and international markets. With a renewed focus on deregulation and support for critical industries, the President’s approach is aimed at transforming the U.S. economy into a powerhouse of growth and opportunity.

Leavitt’s comments come at a time when the administration is rolling out a series of initiatives intended to boost manufacturing, promote technology investment, and strengthen national security through economic resilience. By underscoring the openness of America’s business climate, Leavitt sought to assure investors and entrepreneurs that the U.S. remains a land of opportunity under Trump’s leadership.

In her detailed explanation, Leavitt also touched on how these policies would help mitigate longstanding economic challenges. The administration’s emphasis on reducing barriers for businesses is expected to spur innovation and create jobs, ultimately driving sustained economic growth.

As the nation watches closely, President Trump’s economic agenda continues to generate both optimism and debate. With initiatives aimed at revitalizing the economy and reinforcing America’s position on the global stage, Leavitt’s message is clear: under this administration, America is not just open for business—it is poised for robust growth.

In a riveting segment on Fox News tonight, political commentator Stephen Miller delivered a masterclass on the Oval Office showdown between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy. Known for his no-holds-barred commentary, Miller zeroed in on what he described as the “insulting” way Zelenskyy handled himself during the meeting.

Miller praised his own ability to cut through the noise and get to the heart of the matter. “Millions of American hearts swelled with overflowing pride today to watch President Trump put Zelenskyy in his place,” he declared, capturing the attention of viewers across the nation.

According to Miller, the incident served as a stark reminder of the dynamics at play in high-stakes international politics. His incisive analysis highlighted that while Zelenskyy might have once been seen as a potential leader during the early days of conflict, his performance in the Oval Office suggests a different narrative as global pressures mount.

For those who missed the broadcast, you can watch the full segment below and witness Miller’s pointed critique and masterful breakdown of today’s events.