Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs the Media – February 5, 2025
Ms. Leavitt: Good afternoon,
everybody.
The Press: Good afternoon.
Ms. Leavitt: Good to see
you all.
President Trump is in charge
and America is back.
This week further demonstrated
that the Trump effect is real.
Over the weekend,
Americans celebrated
the return
of American-Israeli citizen,
Keith Siegel, and two Israelis
who were held captive
by Hamas terrorists
since October 7th, 2023.
President Trump
and his administration
worked diligently
to secure their release
and are committed to freeing
all remaining hostages.
Yesterday, as you all know,
President Trump held his first
foreign meeting
at the White House
with Israeli
Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu,
and as the president said,
the bonds of friendship
and affection
between the American
and Israeli
people have endured
for generations,
and are
absolutely unbreakable.
The President is committed
to eliminating Hamas
in securing a lasting piece
for the entire region.
The historic proposal for the
United States to take over Gaza,
announced by President Trump
last night,
underscores this commitment.
Insanity is doing the same
thing over and over again
and expecting
different results.
President Trump is an
outside-of-the-box thinker
and a visionary leader,
who solves problems
that many others,
especially in this city,
claim are unsolvable.
We've already seen the results
from President Trump's
bold peace through strength
diplomacy on the world stage.
In response to President Trump's
tariffs this week,
both Mexico and Canada
took immediate steps
to alleviate
the illegal alien migration
and flow of deadly drugs,
particularly fentanyl,
into our country.
Mexico's president,
Claudia Sheinbaum,
agreed to permanently supply
10,000 Mexican soldiers
on the U.S. border,
who will be
specifically designated
to stopping fentanyl
and criminal aliens
from pouring
into our country,
and Canada's prime minister,
Justin Trudeau,
agreed to appoint
a fentanyl czar,
list cartels as terrorists,
and increased resources
to assist
the 10,000 frontline personnel
at our northern border
with Canada.
In recognition of these steps,
President Trump paused
the implementation of tariffs
for one month while negotiations
continue and final deals
can be structured.
Throughout the transition
and during his
inaugural address,
President Trump made it known
that the United States cannot
and will not allow
the Chinese Communist Party
to continue with its effective
and growing control
over the Panama Canal.
Following Secretary Rubio's
successful first trip
and visit there
over the weekend,
Panama's president said
he will allow its participation
in the Chinese Communist
Party's…
It will no longer
allow the participation
in the Belt
and Road Initiative,
that participation will expire.
This is significant,
because Panama was the first
Latin American nation
to join Belt and Road,
and now becomes the first
to back away from it
because of President Trump.
And to assist with the ongoing
mass deportation effort,
El Salvador's president has
agreed to the most unprecedented
migratory agreement
anywhere in the world.
Because President Trump
is back in charge,
El Salvador has offered
for illegal aliens
of any nationality facing
deportation in the U.S.
to be booked
in his country's prison system.
And finally, President Trump's
envoy for special missions,
Ric Grenell,
traveled to Venezuela,
and not only secured the release
of six American hostages,
but Venezuela also agreed
to accept the return
of illegal alien
Tren de Aragua gang members.
All of these incredible
victories prove how well
President Trump's peace-through-
strength approach is working,
and the days of weak
American leadership are over.
In another success story
this week,
efforts to seal the border,
halt the invasion,
and carry out the largest
mass deportation campaign
continue at lightning speed.
Customs and Border Protection
has approximately
79 miles of new border
wall projects already underway
in various stages
of construction and planning.
The first flights arrived
to Guantanamo Bay
yesterday afternoon
out of El Paso.
"Who were some of the passengers
aboard you may ask?"
There were 10 members
of the transnational gang,
Tren de Aragua,
on this flight,
and overall,
our heroic ICE agents
continue to prioritize
the removal of violent criminal,
illegal aliens in communities
across the country.
On February 3rd, ICE Dallas
arrested a citizen of Nicaragua
who has been convicted
of sexual assault, strong arm,
and lewd acts with a minor,
and sentenced to 15 years
in prison.
ICE Los Angeles arrested
a Mexican citizen
who has been convicted
of lewd acts with a minor
and sentenced to 364 days.
ICE Atlanta arrested
a citizen of Mexico
who has been convicted
of homicide by vehicle
and hit-and-run, and sentenced
to six months confinement.
ICE New York arrested
a Venezuela national
and known TDA gang member
who has a prior
criminal conviction
for assault in the third degree,
causing physical injury.
Americans are safer every single
time one of these criminals
is arrested
and deported from our country.
On another important
and ongoing topic,
the Senate is working
fast to confirm
President Trump's exceptional
cabinet nominees in the face
of relentless media
smear campaigns.
As of right now,
12 members of the president's
cabinet have been confirmed.
Most recently, Pam Bondi,
who, as you all know,
I was just in the Oval Office
for that swearing in ceremony,
surrounded by Pam's
lovely family,
and we look forward
to watching her serve
as the Attorney General
of the United States.
According to CNN,
President Trump
is getting more cabinet
picks confirmed
so far than the average
president in the modern era,
another success story,
and we believe it's critical
that Republicans in the Senate
majority stay tough
and keep their foot
on the gas
to confirm all of the remaining
nominees as quickly as possible,
so we can continue President
Trump's important work here
at the White House and across
our entire federal government.
Lastly, throughout his
historic campaign,
President Trump pledged
to restore common sense
to our country,
and he's continuing
to deliver on that
with an executive order
that he will sign later today.
The president will be signing
an executive order
keeping men out
of women's sports
to defend the safety
of athletes,
protect competitive integrity,
and uphold the promise
of Title IX.
This common-sense action
from President Trump
ends the disgusting
betrayal of women and girls
by the previous
administration,
who, for years,
catered to radical activists
who wanted biological males
to be treated as women
in workplace showers,
competitive sports, prisons,
and even rape shelters.
Gender ideology
insanity is over.
Submissions from individuals
across the country
interested in participating
in our new media seat
at a future briefing
continue to flood in.
We are at more than 12,000
and counting.
If you're watching right now
and are interested,
you can continue to apply
on our new media website,
whitehouse.gov/newmedia.
And in the seat today,
we have a longtime national
television broadcaster.
I'm sure many of you
recognized her when she came in.
Sage Steel,
who is now the host
of an incredibly
successful podcast,
the Sage Steel Show on YouTube
and all podcast platforms,
and previously,
Sage was a fixture at ESPN
from 2007 to 2023.
Primarily hosting Sports Center,
which we all know well,
before leaving the company
to exercise
her first amendment
rights more freely.
We are honored to welcome her
to the Briefing Room today.
She will be joining
the president
at the big EO
signing later this afternoon.
I know many of you
will be there as well.
So, Sage, why don't you
kick us off
on this very exciting day
for women and girls
across the country?
Thank you for joining us.
The Press: It is exciting,
and Karoline,
thank you for welcoming
people like me
with a little bit
of a different perspective,
different background
in this seat.
It really does mean a lot.
Thank you.
Obviously the house
already passed
the Protection of Women
and Girls in Sports Act,
which was a really big step
for women and girls so far.
The Senate, as we know,
has not brought it up to vote.
We all know executive orders
can be overturned,
so I'm wondering how important
it is to the president
to get Congress to bring this,
to pass legislation,
so there are no instances
like the past administration
that really tried
to destroy Title IX?
Ms. Leavitt: It's
incredibly important
that Congress immediately
acts on this priority.
I think the president
is really setting the tone.
Making this a very
immediate priority
for this administration,
just as he promised to do
on the campaign trail.
And I'd like to get into the
executive order a little bit,
because it is the news of the
day here at the White House,
and talk about
what this executive action
will actually do.
So, the executive order
that the president
will be signing later
this afternoon,
as I said, upholds
the promise of Title IX.
It also will require the DOJ
to abide by the nationwide
previous administration's
illegal Title IX rewrite
that would've dissolved single-
sex spaces and opportunities.
It also requires
immediate action,
including enforcement actions
against schools
and athletic associations
comprised of schools
that deny women
single-sex sports,
and single-sex locker rooms.
The executive order also calls
for the convening of private
sporting bodies
in the White House.
We want them to come
to this campus
so the president
can hear in person
the stories of female athletes
who have suffered
lifelong injuries,
who have been silenced
and forced to shower with men,
and compete with men on athletic
fields across the country.
Many of those women will be
at the White House today.
I encourage all of you
in the media
to actually talk to them,
to hear their stories.
And I would also just add
one more thing.
This is a wildly
popular position
with the American people.
In fact, there was a new poll
recently that showed
the overwhelming
majority of Democrats
also support keeping biological
men out of women's sports.
And so I know the president
is very excited about the bill
signing that will take place
at 3:00 this afternoon.
You'll hear from him
more on that later,
and we look forward
to seeing you there, Sage.
So thank you very, very much.
Garrett, great to see
you here today.
The Press: Thank you.
On Gaza, the president
has spent
basically his entire
public career
criticizing foreign
entanglements, nation-building,
sending American troops
to fight abroad,
particularly in the Middle East.
This plan seems like it
could ultimately involve
all of those things.
Can you explain this reversal
and how building and owning Gaza
squares with America
first foreign policy?
Ms. Leavitt: I would reject
the premise of your question
that this forces
the United States
to be entangled
in conflicts abroad.
The president
has not committed
to putting boots
on the ground in Gaza.
He has also said
that the United States
is not going to pay
for the rebuilding of Gaza.
His administration is going
to work with our partners
in the region
to reconstruct this region.
And let me just take
a step back, Garrett,
because this is an out
of the box idea.
That's who President Trump is.
That's why the American people
elected him.
And his goal is lasting peace
in the Middle East
for all people in the region.
And as I said
in my opening remarks,
we've had the same people
pushing the same solutions
to this problem for decades,
and it's been made very clear
to the president
that the United States
needs to be involved
in this rebuilding effort
to ensure stability
in the region for all people.
But that does not mean boots
on the ground in Gaza.
It does not mean
American taxpayers
will be funding this effort.
It means Donald Trump,
who is the best dealmaker
on the planet,
is going to strike a deal
with our partners in the region.
The Press: He did not rule out
American troops
in Gaza last night.
Are you doing that now?
Ms. Leavitt: I am saying
that the president
has not committed
to that just yet.
He has not made that commitment.
And you know that.
The Press: And on
the foreign partners,
the Jordanians,
the Egyptians,
the Saudis have already
panned this plan.
What foreign partners, if any,
have expressed any interest
in being part of it?
Ms. Leavitt: Well, the president
has said
he's been socialing this idea
for quite some time.
He's been thinking about this.
He said in his remarks
last night,
this was not a decision
or an announcement
that he takes lightly.
And the president has already
spoken to the President El-Sisi.
In fact, that was
his first foreign leader call.
He's meeting with
the King of Jordan,
King Abdullah next week.
He spoke with
the King of Bahrain.
He spoke with the Crown
Prince of Saudi Arabia.
And he has made it very clear,
he's been very vocal
that he expects our partners
in the region,
particularly Egypt and Jordan,
to accept Palestinian refugees
temporarily so that
we can rebuild their home.
I'd like to show you some images
of Gaza that were taken.
Fox News aired this.
I mean, that is, as they put it,
an apocalyptic scene in Gaza.
This is an unhabitable place
for human beings.
Do you really think that
families can live their dream
in a region
that looks like this,
with no running water,
no electricity,
and the special envoy
to the president,
Steve Witkoff, recently traveled
to Gaza, as you all know,
and he came back with images
that he showed the president
of the dire situation here.
The president made this decision
with a humanitarian heart
for all people in the region.
Peter?
The Press: Thank you, Caroline.
Are any officials here
preparing to fight democratic
lawmakers in the streets?
Ms. Leavitt: Absolutely not.
And thanks for the question.
The Press: Some elected
Democrats are so steamed
about DOGE.
Congresswoman LaMonica McIver
says, "We are at war."
Ilhan Omar says,
"We might actually see
somebody get killed."
And Chris Van Hollen says,
"We have to fight this
in the Congress.
We have to fight this
in the streets."
So what now?
Ms. Leavitt: And may I just
point out,
if you heard
that type of violent,
enticing rhetoric
from our side of the aisle,
from Republican leaders
on Capitol Hill,
I think there would be a lot
more outrage in this room today.
It's unacceptable, the comments
that have been made
by these Democrat leaders.
And frankly, they don't even
know what they're talking about.
Because President Trump
was an elected
with a mandate
from the American people
to make this government
more efficient.
He campaigned across this
country with Elon Musk
vowing that Elon
was going to head up
the Department
of Government Efficiency,
and the two of them,
with a great team around them,
were going to look
at the receipts
of this federal government
and ensure it's accountable
to American taxpayers.
That's all that
is happening here.
And for Democrat officials
to incite violence
and encourage Americans
to take to the streets
is incredibly alarming,
and they should be held
accountable for that rhetoric.
The Press: It sounds
like something
that they're most
concerned about
is DOGE engineers
with access to Treasury systems.
Can you clarify?
Do the DOGE engineers
have read-only access
in these systems?
Ms. Leavitt: Yes.
The Press: So they're not
allowed to write new code?
Ms. Leavitt: No.
The Press: They're not? Okay.
Ms. Leavitt: No.
The Press: And then,
one more thing.
NBC is reporting that
some of the illegal immigrants
that we've seen rounded up and
arrested are not being deported.
They're being released
with ankle or wrist
monitoring devices,
or they have to check in
on the phone.
So is the administration
arresting more people
than you have room for?
Ms. Leavitt: I have seen
the reports,
and I'm glad you brought it up
because we want to address it.
There have been a total
of 461 illegal aliens,
this is of this morning,
when I got this information
from DHS,
that have been released
from custody of the more
than 8,000
that have been arrested
since President Trump
was inaugurated.
It's less than 6%.
And there are reasons
for their release.
Some of the factors include
a lack of significant likelihood
of removal
in the foreseeable future,
lack of detention availability,
which is something
this president
and this administration
has been incredibly vocal about.
We are doing everything we can
to deport
and detain
illegal immigrants,
but we need Congress's help
to increase funding
for border patrol
and for ICE to increase
detention capability
in our facilities.
And then, other serious
medical conditions
have also been the reasons
for some of the release
of these individuals.
But none of them
have final deportation orders.
Many of them
are probably contesting
their immigration status.
I'd refer you to DHS
for more details,
but I did get that information,
because I knew
it'd be a question.
So thank you. Sure.
The Press: Caroline?
Ms. Leavitt: Yes.
The Press: The president
and you here again today
have made clear,
given the devastation,
you think Palestinians
have no choice
but to leave Gaza
and go elsewhere.
But Palestinians say
this is their home,
they don't want to go.
The president last night
said he's willing to use
the military if necessary.
Is the US prepared to remove
Palestinians from Gaza by force?
Ms. Leavitt: The president
is prepared
to rebuild Gaza for Palestinians
and all people in the region,
peace-loving people who want
real economic development
and opportunity in the region.
This is a region
that has been controlled
by Iranian-backed
terrorists, Hamas,
who have brutalized
not just Israelis,
but Palestinians too.
It is because of Hamas that you
see those images on that screen,
that Gaza has become
a demolition site,
because Hamas launched
that brutal attack on Israel
on October the 7th.
And so, again, I would stress,
President Trump wants to ensure
that this can be a place where
all people can live in peace.
He is a peacemaker-in-chief.
He made that very clear
in his first term.
And as for how that
will be accomplished,
the president and his team
are talking with our allies
in the region
to consider next steps.
The Press: But should
the American people
be prepared to see
US military on the ground,
fighting a ground war
against Hamas?
Ms. Leavitt: Again,
the president has not committed
to US troops
in the region.
The Press: But it is an option?
Ms. Leavitt: I have said
that the president
has not committed to that yet.
Sure.
The Press: Let me just follow up
on that, though.
Why not rule out the idea
of committing US troops?
This has been
a longstanding argument
that the President has made,
really over the last decade
or so,
talking about endless wars
not something the US wants.
Why not rule out?
Ms. Leavitt: Because I think
the president is very good
when he's making deals
and negotiating not
to rule out anything
because he wants to preserve
that leverage bridge
and negotiations.
And so I think that's what
he's doing here. Mary.
The Press: If I can follow up
on that though.
He also said that everyone
loves this plan.
He said that in
the Oval Office this morning.
Ms. Leavitt: Sure.
The Press: In fact, the deputy
prime minister of Jordan
called it a declaration of war
on the Arab people.
So how does he square
the fact
that even some Republicans
on The Hill
are objecting to this
or questioning this?
How does he square the facts
saying everyone loves this plan?
Ms. Leavitt: Well, King Abdullah
of Jordan
will be here next week,
so I can provide
you more context
on the conversations
he will have directly
with the President of the United
States after that meeting.
And I would just point out that
there's been a lot of leaders
and officials all around
the world who have doubted,
I suppose, the deal making
ability of President Trump.
You heard the Panama leader
saying that he would not agree
to some of the concessions
that he has now made
because of Secretary Rubio's
visit.
You had the Colombian president
saying
he wouldn't accept flights
of Colombian illegal
who have entered
into our country illegally,
and those flights
are underway.
So actions speak louder
than words. Dasha.
The Press: Karoline, you said,
the president has been
working on this idea
for a while
behind the scenes now.
Is there a written plan
based on the president's
proposal for Gaza?
And if so, when was it drafted
and who had a hand in that?
Ms. Leavitt: The plan was
written
in the president's remarks
last night
as he revealed it to the world
and to the American people,
and his team are continuing
to be engaged on this effort.
I saw the National Security
Advisor this morning.
He has a very busy day of calls.
And they will again continue
to engage with our partners.
That includes
Steve Witkoff as well.
Mary.
The Press: Two questions for you
on the news of the day.
So how is today's
executive order going to impact
the 2028 Summer Olympics
in Los Angeles?
For example,
would a man who thinks
that he's a transgender woman
be allowed to compete
as a female on US soil?
Ms. Leavitt: It's a very good
question,
and the president has
actually mentioned this,
that he does expect
the Olympic Committee
and the NCAA
to no longer allow men
to compete in women's sports.
And I think the president
with the signing of his pen
starts a very public pressure
campaign on these organizations
to do the right thing
for women
and for girls
across the country.
Again, this is
an incredibly popular position.
There have been many
notable female athletes
who have had the courage
to speak out
against some very powerful
institutions in this country.
They deserve to have
a voice and a say.
The president
is bringing their voice
to the highest level at the
White House this afternoon,
and he expects
these organizations
to comply with this federal
executive order
that he'll be signing today.
The Press: Thank you.
And one more.
On media coverage
of this executive order
and the topic in general,
what's the White House's
view of framing
that calls men
transgender females,
or similar rhetoric
coming from organizations
like the ACLU and GLAD?
Ms. Leavitt: Well, it's been
very clear.
The policy
of this administration
is that there are only
two sexes,
male and female, pretty simple.
Brian Glenn.
The Press: Yes. USAID has gotten
a lot of attention
the last couple of days with
some of these bizarre things
that taxpayers
have been funding.
Now it looks like there are
a couple media outlets
that have been dragged
into this conversation
as far as USAID funding
as well.
Does the president
have any comment on that?
Ms. Leavitt: So upon coming out
here to the briefing room,
I was made aware of the funding
from USAID to media outlets,
including Politico, who I know
has a seat in this room.
And I can confirm that the more
than 8 million taxpayer dollars
that have gone to essentially
subsidizing subscriptions
to Politico
on the American taxpayers dime,
will no longer be happening.
The DOGE team is working on
canceling those payments now.
Again, this is a whole
of government effort
to ensure that we are
going line by line
when it comes to
the federal government's books.
And this president
and his team
are making decisions
across the board
on do these receipts
serve the interests
of the American people?
Is this a good use of
the American taxpayers' money?
If it is not, that funding
will no longer be sent abroad
and American taxpayers
will see significant savings
because of that effort.
Thank you.
I'd like to give some love
to the back row.
I've heard that unfortunately
they haven't been called on
in years past.
So Reagan,
why don't you go ahead.
The Press: Thanks, Karoline.
The WHCA announced
that comedian Amber Ruffin,
who has called the president
a toddler
with his pants pulled down,
will be the entertainment
for this year's
Correspondents Dinner.
Does the White House
have a reaction to this choice?
And will the president be
attending the dinner this year?
Ms. Leavitt: Certainly an
interesting choice.
I have the President's
invitation on my desk.
I have the invitation
for myself on my desk as well.
Haven't talked to
the president about it.
When he makes his decision,
I will let you all know, but-
The Press: How about you,
Karoline?
Ms. Leavitt: … definitely an
interesting choice
of the comedian.
I'll talk to the boss about it
and see what we decide.
Sure. Go ahead.
The Press: Thank you.
The Press: Karoline,
in the back.
Ms. Leavitt: Yes. Yes.
The Press: Thank you.
Appreciate it.
On the executive order,
said to be signed today,
you said that this
will be enforced.
Can you spell out for schools
and the public
how exactly
the administration plans
to enforce this even
at the local levels?
And on top of that,
there are human rights groups
who say that this could
expose kids to discrimination.
What is your response to that?
Ms. Leavitt: I think kids have
already been exposed
to discrimination,
especially young women and girls
who have been forced
to shower in locker rooms
with biological men,
who have been forced to compete
on playing fields
with biological men,
which is incredibly unfair
and unsafe,
and again, an incredibly
unpopular policy
with the American people.
As for the actions that
this executive order takes,
I already laid those out at
the beginning of the briefing.
I'm happy to give you
a copy of this fact sheet
so you can let your audiences
across the country know.
The Press: What's your message
to schools
who don't comply with this?
Ms. Leavitt: They should,
because it's going to be
federal law
in about an hour and a half.
So your colleague to your right,
to my left.
The Press: Thanks, Karoline.
Taylor with Spectrum News.
You talked a bit about DOGE.
Elon Musk is currently
a "special government employee"
who also owns companies
that have billions of dollars
in federal contracts.
You said earlier this week
that he has abided
by all applicable
federal laws,
but what steps is
the Trump Administration
taking to address
that conflict of interest?
Ms. Leavitt: The president was
already asked and answered
this question this week,
and he said, if Elon Musk
comes across a conflict
of interest with the contracts
and the funding
that DOGE is overseeing,
then Elon will excuse himself
from those contracts.
And he has, again,
abided by all applicable laws.
In the back left.
Go ahead.
The Press: Trade adviser
Peter Navarro
when asked about the external
revenue service today said,
"We're going to collect
a lot of tariff revenues
and we're going to
get tax cuts out of it."
Is it the official position
of the White House
that tariffs will lower taxes
for Americans?
Ms. Leavitt: President has
always been clear
that he believes tariffs
are a tax on foreign nations,
and he's committed
to cutting taxes
for the American people
here at home.
He also believes tariffs
are a great revenue raiser
for this country,
and that's exactly
why he has committed
to the creation
of the External Revenue Service,
which I think is
a phenomenal idea.
We'll just go down
the whole row. Go ahead.
The Press: Tom Boehm
with the BBC.
Can you confirm that under
the president's plans for Gaza,
any and all Palestinians
who want to stay in Gaza
on their land
will be allowed to do so?
Ms. Leavitt: I can confirm
that the president
is committed
to rebuilding Gaza
and to temporarily relocating
those who are there
because as I've showed
you repeatedly,
it is a demolition site.
There is no running water,
there is no electricity.
The president wants these
individuals to live in peace.
He is committed to doing that
with this very bold new plan.
And we will continue to keep you
apprised of updates
as we receive them.
Ed Lawrence, go ahead.
Yes, go ahead, Ed.
The Press: Appreciate.
Thank you.
So now that the President
Trump's policies
are starting to take shape,
how long will it take
to cycle through
and get some of
the actual prices
that Americans
are paying to come down?
Ms. Leavitt: The prices
at the store
and at the grocery pump?
The Press: All of the above.
Ms. Leavitt: Across the board?
Sure.
Well, the president is doing
everything he can, obviously,
to reduce the cost of
living crisis in this country
as quickly as possible.
That's why he signed
a litany of executive orders
across the board.
In the first couple
of weeks here,
he declared a national
energy emergency.
He committed to cutting
10 regulations
for every new one
on the book.
As you know, working for
a Fox Business-related outlet,
deregulation and energy
independence are huge drivers
of reducing inflation
in this country.
And I think Americans
can be assured
by the results President Trump
had in his first term,
when again, inflation was 1.4%
when he left office.
The Press: Is it months
or is it a year?
And will Americans have
the patience to wait for it?
Ms. Leavitt: I don't have
a timeline,
but the president
is doing everything
that he possibly can to reduce
cost of living
for Americans at home.
Phil Wegmann.
The Press: Thank you.
Is it worth risking the life
of a single US Marine
to turn the Gaza Strip into
the Riviera of the Middle East?
Ms. Leavitt: Phil, I'm not sure
why you're asking me
that question,
because I've already said
the president has not committed
to sending Marines or any boots
on the ground in Gaza.
We'll bring to the front row,
Ed O'Keefe.
The Press: [inaudible 00:26:53]
possibility?
The Press: Good to see you again
here in the front row, Karoline.
Two things, on today's
announcement, Title IX.
If he scales back
the education department
or moves
to shut it down entirely,
what entity
will enforce Title IX?
Ms. Leavitt: As of now,
this will be enforced
through education,
through Title IX.
If the abolishment of
the Department of Education
continues,
which as the President
said yesterday,
it's something his team
is looking at and considering.
It's something he talked a lot
about on the campaign trail.
Then of course, we will look
at additional maneuvers
to ensure that these
very important
policies can be implemented.
The Press: Okay,
so the education
abolishment thing's still
on the table Title IX
[inaudible 00:27:34]?
Ms. Leavitt: Yeah, the President
talked about it yesterday
in the Oval Office,
and he has good reason
to talk about it.
I mean, look,
our education system
is failing students
in this country.
The Nation's report card,
I brought it up
in my remarks last week,
it shows that fourth graders
are not reading
at the level they should.
I believe it was 40% of them
are proficient in reading.
As the mother of a child,
I want an education system
that helps my child read
and write,
teaches him math,
nothing else in the classroom.
And the President
is wholeheartedly committed
to we can make academia
great again in this country.
The Press: One other
[inaudible 00:28:06], Karoline.
Ms. Leavitt: Deanna. Go ahead.
The Press: Thanks, Karoline.
The does the President,
is he looking at offering
anything to these Arab countries
that take in Palestinians?
Is he willing to give them
anything in return?
And secondly, when the President
announced his taking
over Gaza policy yesterday,
was Netanyahu aware of this?
And what was his reaction
when Trump presented
that idea to him?
Ms. Leavitt: I won't get ahead
of the President's discussions
or negotiations
on your first question
about what would be offered.
I think the President's
made it clear
that he expects these nations
in the region to step up
and to accept
Palestinian refugees who will be
temporarily relocated
for the rebuilding of Gaza.
As for whether
Prime Minister Netanyahu
was aware before the President's
remarks, he was indeed.
I wasn't present
for that reaction.
But again, this is something the
President has been socializing
and thinking about
for quite some time.
Nick, good to see you.
The Press: Oh, Jordan.
Ms. Leavitt: Jordan. Sorry.
The Press: Thank you, Karoline.
So Secretary Hegseth announced
yesterday that Army
recruiting levels have reached
12-year highs in December,
15-year highs in January.
What is making young people
want to serve the military
under the Trump
Administration?
And how does that contrast
to Biden's failure
consistently to meet recruiting
[inaudible 00:29:23]?
Does President Trump's anti-DEI
agenda play a role in this?
Ms. Leavitt: Well, first of all,
the recruitment level
for all branches of our military
are at crisis levels.
And it serves
as a national security
risk that our military branches
are not fully staffed
to where they need to be.
And I do believe
it's a culture problem
within these institutions
that the President is very much
committed to fixing,
as emphasized by
the executive orders
he has signed to root DEI
out of the military.
And I think when young men
and women
who are honorably signing up
to serve in our nation's
military see
somebody like Pete Hegseth,
the new Secretary of Defense
who is a proven war fighter,
who risked his life
in battle for this country.
Who understands
what it means to deploy
and to defend the Constitution
and your nation abroad,
and to put your life
on the line.
When they see a leader
like that
and a leader
like President Trump
who has committed to peace
through strength,
that's very inspiring.
And we look forward to seeing
those recruitment numbers
and retention numbers
skyrocketing
over the next four years.
And I know Pete Hegseth
is committed to increasing
recruitment
at all branches of the military.
I'll defer you
to the Department of Defense
on exactly what he plans
to implement. Jeff.
The Press: Thanks very much.
Two questions.
One, the President yesterday
used the word permanent
for permanently
resettled Palestinians.
I hear you saying
temporarily today.
Is that a shift
or a specific change
that you want to highlight?
And my second question is,
yesterday he spoke about
the U.S. owning Gaza.
Who owns Gaza now and how would
the U.S. acquire ownership?
Ms. Leavitt: Well, Gaza
is currently run
by Iranian-backed terrorists
in the Middle East,
Hamas,
who we all agree,
I think everybody in the region
agrees that can no longer stand.
Just look at the events
of October 7th
and the events since.
And the President,
again is committed
to rebuilding the region
for all people who want
to return to it
once it is no longer
a demolition site.
And it's a place where people
can actually live and thrive
in harmony,
as he said last night.
His words not mine.
Daniel.
The Press: And permanent versus
temporarily resettled
[inaudible 00:31:31]?
Ms. Leavitt: The President
has made it clear
that they need to be temporarily
relocated out of Gaza
for the rebuilding
of this effort.
Again, it's a demolition site
right now.
It's not a livable place
for any human being.
And I think it's actually
quite evil to suggest
that people should live
in such dire conditions. Daniel.
The Press: [inaudible 00:31:47]
Karoline, thank you so much.
The Daily
[inaudible 00:31:49]
says that the President
will be meeting
with a pair of governors today,
Governor
Abbott of Texas and Governor
Newsom of California.
It comes after the President
took executive action
to turn the water back
on in California.
Billions of gallons
are flowing now.
What can you tell us
about the two meetings
and the importance
of President
Trump's actions
to help people in California?
Ms. Leavitt: Sure.
Those meetings will be
taking place shortly,
so I will get out of here
to get to those meetings.
We can always provide you
a readout, as we always do.
We try to be very transparent
about what the President
is doing in the Oval Office.
Perhaps, he'll even
call you in to join him.
We never know around here,
as you all know.
But Governor Abbott is obviously
a great friend
and ally to the President.
He has been on the front lines
of the border crisis
in this country.
And as for Governor
Gavin Newsom,
well the President
is willing to work
with anybody from blue states
or red states to do what's best
for the American people.
And he really enjoyed,
the President
really enjoyed his trip
to Pacific Palisades last week.
He felt very inspired
by the frustration
of the residents there.
And he has been wholeheartedly
committed to ensuring
that the water
is flowing in California
to prevent these wildfires,
and also that people have access
to their properties.
And he has continued to apply
tremendous pressure
to Gavin Newsom
and also the Los Angeles Mayor
to allow private residents
and property owners
to access their property.
He believes that's
their right to do so
and they should be
able to do it.
And one more thing
before I wrap up,
because I do want
to get to these meetings.
And I will see you all at the EO
signing later this afternoon.
I would just say that
you brought to mind California
and North Carolina
who continue to be
on our hearts.
And the President
and this administration
are committed to ensuring
that these individuals
get the funding that they need.
And I would just say
a strong message to Democrats
who are out there
pretending to be outraged
about the long list of crap
that this administration
is cutting federal waste
and funding like $2 million
for sex changes in Guatemala,
6 million to fund tourism
in Egypt,
20 million on a new
Sesame Street Show in Iraq,
4.5 million to combat
disinformation in Kazakhstan.
I could go on and on.
And I'm happy
to provide this list
to every single one of you.
Democrats are outraged
that the American people,
they want their taxpayers
going to good uses,
not stuff like this.
But then they're very quiet
about the fact
that there are still
North Carolinians
and people in California
who have lost everything.
And in the last four years,
this federal government
did nothing to help them.
This President will continue
to put Americans first,
and I think the successes of
this week so far speak to that.
And it's only Wednesday.
So I'll see you guys
later this week,
and we'll see you this
afternoon. Thank you very much.
The Press: Thanks, Karoline.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ddd/12ddddb2d7d5f5c3cfc8494b70d0932818798c49" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db604/db6040395bf182030f7b3256c75a436a86ae9a2e" alt=""
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs the Media – February 12, 2025
On February 12, 2025, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt held a press briefing in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room.
She began by announcing President Trump’s phone calls with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The President reaffirmed his commitment to brokering a peace agreement to end the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine.
Leavitt also shared news of the release of Marc Fogel, an American teacher who had been detained in Russia. This development was seen as a positive step in U.S.-Russia relations and an important milestone toward diplomacy and peace.
Additionally, the President signed an executive order banning the use of paper straws in federal agencies, arguing that they are ineffective and unpopular. On trade policy, he signed proclamations raising tariffs on steel and aluminum imports by 25% to protect national security and prioritize American workers.
Leavitt also highlighted the confirmation of Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence and urged the Senate to confirm the President’s other nominees swiftly.
Finally, she announced a large-scale deportation effort targeting undocumented immigrants with criminal records, emphasizing the administration’s commitment to enforcing immigration laws.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ddd/12ddddb2d7d5f5c3cfc8494b70d0932818798c49" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db604/db6040395bf182030f7b3256c75a436a86ae9a2e" alt=""
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, Feb. 20, 2025
MS. LEAVITT: Hello. Good afternoon, everybody. I brought some heavy hitters in here with me today.
Today marks one month of President Trump’s return to the Oval Office, and there is no denying this administration is off to a historic start. The President has already signed 73 executive orders. That is more than double the number signed by Joe Biden and more than quadruple the number signed by Barack Obama over the same period.
These executive orders have ended burdensome regulations; sealed the border; unleashed our domestic energy sector; eliminated divisive DEI from our federal government; stopped the weaponization of government; cut waste, fraud, and abuse; reinstituted “America First” trade and foreign policies; and ultimately restored common sense.
The President also signed the Laken Riley Act into law, which ensures ICE will detain illegal aliens arrested or charged with theft or violence.
As of today, the Senate has already confirmed 18 Cabinet-level nominees, which is more than at this point under the Obama administration in 2009 and more than double the pace of the Biden administration in 2021.
And today, we expect Kash Patel to be confirmed as the next director of the FBI.
We are proud to announce that the president will host his first official Cabinet meeting here at the White House next Wednesday, February 26th.
In just four weeks, President Trump has already hosted the leaders of Israel, Japan, Jordan, and India. And next Monday, the President will host France’s President, Emmanuel Macron, and on Thursday, the UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, will visit the White House as well.
As you all know, over the past month, the President has taken questions from the press — all of you — nearly every single day, sometimes on multiple different occasions in the same day, on any topic any of you wish to talk about.
President Trump set the tone on this approach immediately when he took more than 12 times the questions in his first few hours in office as Joe Biden did in his entire first week.
Yesterday, we hosted a local media row here at the White House with television and radio stations from across the country that reached up to 60 million viewers and listeners.
In our ongoing pursuit of transparency, on this one-month celebration, I am thrilled to bring three of my colleagues and our policy experts here at the White House to further recap this incredible first month of accomplishments in greater detail.
We have Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller; the Director of the National Economic Council, Kevin Hassett; and our National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz.
I will hand it over to them. They will deliver brief remarks on the accomplishments of this administration in the first month, and then we will open it up to Q and A. When we open up the Q and A portion, I do ask, for the sake of efficiency in this room, that you direct your question to the principal you seek an answer from. And I will call on you in this room.
But first I will let them roll through their remarks. And first up, I’ll turn it over to Stephen Miller.
MR. MILLER: Thank you. It’s great to be back.
And I want to just thank you all for joining today our one-month celebration of the most historic opening to a presidency in American history. No president comes close to what Donald Trump has achieved over just the last 30 days.
He has packed eight years of transformative action restoring this nation, restoring our laws, restoring fairness, restoring economic opportunity, restoring national security in just one month. No one in this country has ever seen anything like it.
And when you look at the consequentiality and the significance and the transformative nature of the actions he’s taking, it truly defies description. For example, in just one area, this nation has been plagued and crippled by illegal discrimination: diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. It strangled our economy. It has undermined public safety. It has made every aspect of life more difficult, more painful, and less safe.
He has ended all DEI across the federal government. He has terminated all federal workers involved in promulgating these unlawful policies. He has ended diversity, equity, and inclusion in all federal contracting. He has restored merit as the cornerstone of all federal policy; restored the full, fair, impartial enforcement of our federal civil rights laws for the first time in generations; and he has cracked down on individuals across this government and nonprofits who have engaged in illegal racial discrimination against the American people.
This includes making clear to every educational institution in this country that ending diversity, equity, and inclusion, ending unlawful race discrimination is a precondition of receiving federal funds.
He has also saved women’s sports by ending the participation of men in women’s sports. He has ended radical gender ideology across the entire federal government, and he’s pressured the private sector to also end and combat radical gender ideology. He’s reestablished the scientific and biological truth that there are only two sexes in this country — male and female — that those are biologically based determinations. They are not based and can never be based on gender identity.
That includes rooting out of the Department of Defense all DEI policies, all critical race theory, all gender madness, and once again having a military that is focused solely and exclusively on readiness, preparedness, and lethality.
As I’m sure Kevin will talk about more, of course, he has undertaken a historic cost-cutting effort across the federal government, launching the first-ever Department of Government Efficiency, uncovering corruption on a scale that we never thought imaginable, terminating every single federal worker that we — that we have found to be engaged in the corruption and theft and the waste of taxpayer dollars, and already saving $50 billion in a single year, which over a 10-year period would be $500 billion. Just think about how vast and enormous that sum is.
Of course, as you all know, he has renamed the Gulf of Mexico to its correct and proper name: the Gulf of America. He has renamed Mount Denali into Mount McKinley, part of a historic effort to restore patriotism and national pride all across this land.
He has ended the weaponization of the federal government, restored the Department of Justice to its true mission of combating threats to this nation and keeping the American people safe.
He has ended all federal censorship of free speech. This has been one of the greatest crises that has plagued this nation. Years and years and years, the federal government violating the First Amendment to take away Americans’ right of free speech — President Trump has ended that. And he has demanded that all federal workers, all law enforcement cease any effort to intimidate the rights of Americans or to police their speech.
He has also restored the death penalty at the Department of Justice, including for illegal aliens who commit murder, including for those who murder cops, and including for all of those who threaten Americans with heinous acts of violence. The death penalty is back. Law and order is back. The streets are being made safe once again.
On the public health front, he has launched the nation’s first-ever commission — the MAHA Commission — Make America Healthy Again, following the historic confirmation of RFK Jr., to finally uncover the true root causes of the public health crisis in this country, the childhood disease epidemic in this country, the spiraling rates of pediatric cancer and devastating childhood sickness.
He has finally created a situation where the federal heal- — health agencies in this country will be focused on preventing disease, on keeping children from getting sick in the first place, not sentencing them to a lifetime in and out of hospitals, suffering needlessly, when we can find ways to prevent this epidemic of illness.
Then, of course, on homeland security. Today, it is officially the law of the land at the conclusion of the congressional notification process that six Mexican cartels and two transnational gangs — Tren de Aragua, or TDA, and MS-13 — so eight organizations in total — are now formally designated as foreign terrorist organizations, which means that every single member of those organizations who operates on U.S. soil is now, as a legal matter, a terrorist, and they will be treated as terrorists.
This is a sea change in U.S. policy. And this means the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security, along with the rest of U.S. law enforcement and the Department of Defense, are now operating in a legal reality where these cartels are recognized as terrorists, and there will be a whole-of-government effort to remove these terrorists from our soil and to degrade their ability to threaten or undermine any American security or sovereignty interests.
Border crossings since the day he took office are down 95 percent. I think it’s almost impossible to even describe the scale and scope of that achievement. President Trump, within days of taking office, cut border crossings 95 percent.
And those few who have dared to cross are being either prosecuted or deported. They’re either facing significant jail time for trafficking, smuggling, harboring, aiding, impeding, or they’re being immediately removed from our soil. Either way, at the end of the process, they are going home.
He has reimplemented Remain in Mexico, and he has obtained historic cooperation from foreign countries all around the world in accepting their deportees back.
And he has used the United States military to fully seal the southern border with a historic deployment of both active duty and National Guard troops, resumed the building of infrastructure. He has opened up Guantanamo Bay, and he’s using military aircraft to carry out deportations all across this country.
And ICE is joining with ATF, DEA, and FBI to carry out the largest deportation operation in American history. The criminals are going home. The border is sealed shut. America is safe, sovereign, proud, and free. We are a nation that everyone in the world understands all across this planet: You do not come here illegally. You will not get in. You will go to jail. You will go home. You will not succeed.
This is the biggest and most successful change in any area of law enforcement that this nation has ever seen, and he did it in under one month.
Thank you.
MR. HASSETT: Should I go?
MS. LEAVITT: Yes, yes.
MR. HASSETT: Well, thank you, Karoline. Thank you, Stephen.
You know, one of the things that President Trump cares most about is job creation. And it was about seven years ago I had the honor of joining you in this room for the first time, and it looks like we’ve created a lot more jobs in the last month. Look at how many people are here. I — my estimate is about 180 but — but I didn’t count.
So, thank you. It’s really an honor to be back here. I think that I just want to go over a few things and then hand it off to Mike.
The first thing is that the President has told us to prioritize fighting inflation, and he had to do that because, as you know, President Biden let inflation get completely out of control. And he did it with policies that made no sense. They made no sense.
You know, a lot of times, you people say to us — our friends, the journalists — you know, “Why are you doing that?” But — but, you know, I like to think, “Why did they do that? Why did they spend so much money and then — why did the Fed print so much money so that we had inflation as high as we’ve ever seen since Jimmy Carter? So, why did they do that?”
So, we’re addressing inflation. We didn’t have to address it in the first term, because it was always in the 1s, almost always. But we’re going to get it back there.
And how are we doing it? Well, we’re doing it with a plan that President Trump and I and others have talked about in the Oval that involves, like, every level of fighting inflation.
First, the macroeconomic level. We’re cutting spending. We’re cutting spending in negotiations with people on the Hill. We’re cutting spending with the advice of our IT consultant, Elon Musk. And then we’re also looking into supply-side things, like restoring Trump’s tax cuts, maybe even expensing new factories so that there is an explosion of supply. If you have an explosion of supply and a reduction in government demand, then inflation goes way down.
And then, one of the things that you want to say is “Well, when are you going to see it?” Well, the first thing that you’ll see when the markets believe that we’re going to get inflation under control is that the 10-year Treasury rate goes down, because that’s how they think about future expected inflation.
And so, we’re still going to see some memory of Biden’s inflation. It’s not going to go away in a month. But the 10-year Treasury before the last Consumer Price Index had dropped about 40 basis points. Forty basis points because markets were optimistic about our ability to fight inflation.
Forty basis points is kind of not a fun thing to say. I — economists talk that way. I apologize. But the way to think about it is, for a typical mortgage, if that affects the mortgage rate, then it’s going to save a typical family buying a house about a thousand bucks a year, and that’s just in our first month.
Okay. The second thing we’ve done is we’ve had a lot of trade talks. In fact, I was just meeting a minister from Mexico with Howard Lutnick just a couple of hours ago. And we’re talking about reciprocal trade, and we’re also talking about the fentanyl crisis.
And so, reciprocal trade is about our government treating other governments the way they treat us. We want trade to be fair. It turns out that Americans have been disadvantaged by foreign governments over and over, and President Trump wants it to stop. And the fact that struck me as most noticeable, when I started to look at what President Trump was asking us to do, is that last year — last year — we have data — U.S. companies paid $370 billion in taxes to foreign governments — $370 billion. Last year, foreign multinationals paid us $57 billion in taxes.
We have one quarter of world GDP. They have three quarters of world GDP. And we’re paying $370. They’re paying $57. This is not reciprocal. We’re going to try — or we’re going to fix it.
The other thing that we’ve done is we’ve had an all-of-the-above energy approach that’s led by Doug Burgum and Chris and a really large team — EPA — and we’ve already made so many actions that are going to affect the price of energy and lower inflation.
We’ve opened up 625 million acres to energy exploration. We’ve cut 50 years of red tape that makes it so you can’t have permits. And we’ve even made it so that when you go home, if you get a new one, then you can take a shower or flush a toilet or read under a light bulb. We’re doing that too.
So — so, finally, let’s just think about, like, the facts that we can see right now that we think are awesome. So, guess what? Small-business optimism is — has go- — gone up by the most ever since President Trump came in. ISM, which is the measure of what’s going on in manufacturing, it’s expanding again for the first time in years. CEO confidence is the highest it’s been in years. And the reason — the reason people are thinking this is that our policies give people cause for optimism.
And then I want to reiterate what Stephen Miller said, because it’s so important — and it’s so important for financial markets to start to digest this — that if, say, the Treasury secretary or the — any Cabinet secretary, with Elon Musk, is able to find some savings — say, $100 billion — well, in CBO land, that’s actually, like, about 10 times that or maybe 12 times that over a 10-year window.
And so, when you’re thinking about the negotiations right now over reconciliation and thinking about, well, $4 trillion, $5 trillion, well, those numbers, in terms of the savings, are going to end up being small because of all the waste that we’re finding.
And so, we’re incredibly optimistic about the future of inflation and the future of our economy. And we’re optimistic because we’re making so much progress so far, and we already see it in market prices.
And, with that, I’ll hand it off to Mike.
MR. WALTZ: All right. Thanks, Kevin.
Well, good afternoon. What a month and what a sea change in our — in our foreign policy. In addition to what we’re doing on the border and restoring American sovereignty, in addition to what we’re doing in our economy and the job creation and the inflation reduction, we are bringing the world back to where it was at the end of President Trump’s first term, which is a world of peace, prosperity, and — and looking forward and getting us out of the chaos that we’ve just seen over the last four years.
So, over the last month, just to name a few, I had the honor of sitting in the Oval Office as President Trump spoke with President Putin and then immediately spoke with President Zelenskyy, and both of them said only President Trump could bring both sides to the table, and only President Trump could stop the horrific fighting that has been going on now for the better part of four years and that only President Trump could drive the world back to peace. Both of those leaders said that in back-to-back calls.
And, of course, we just had our historic talks mediated by our — our good friends and partners, Saudi Arabia — we give great thanks to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for hosting — and sat down for the first time in years with the Russians and talked about a path forward with peace.
On top of that and one of the things that led to that was a tremendous co- — confidence-building measure that we had with the release of Marc Fogel. I’ll remind everyone, the last time that we had an American released from the Russians, either we gave up a deadly spy; pressured our allies to give up a lethal killer; or we released, under the Biden administration, the world’s most notorious arms dealer, Viktor Bout, who, by the way, had one of his main clients for arms the cartels in — in Mexico and Central America.
We gave up none of that. This was released as a confidence-building measure, working with our great Middle East Envoy, Steve Witkoff, and our secretary of State as a first step towards opening these talks and then moving forward towards peace.
On top of that, we’ve secured, just in a month, the return of a dozen — 12 — American hostages from Russia, from Bulgaria, from Venezuela, the Taliban, and Hamas. Excuse me, that’s from Belarus, not Bulgaria.
We also had — for the first time in quite some time, we took out a senior leader of ISIS, an international financier and recruiter that the military had been trying to take out for quite some time and — and wasn’t able to do so, frankly, because of a bureaucratic approval process. President Trump said, “Take him out.” And that ISIS financier and leader is no longer on this Earth.
We’ve also taken action to eliminate other terrorist organizations in the Middle East. We drove — before the President was even in office, he started talking consequences for people that would hold Americans.
Heretofore, there’s been nothing but upside. You take an American, you get some better deal. You take another one, maybe you get a better deal. No more. There is now nothing but downside for taking Americans illegally, either as hostages or illegal detainees.
And when President Trump sent a very clear message across the Middle East, but particularly to Hamas, that there would be all hell to pay, we suddenly saw a breakthrough. And now we just saw the release of yet another group of hostages. There have been dozens now, including two Americans that we’ve seen once again reunited with their families.
As part of the talks with King Abdullah, he offered — and — and I think the entire world has graciously accepted — to take 2,000 sick children, cancer patients, and others out of Gaza. As a humanitarian — as a humanitarian gesture, 2,000 Gazans will come out of that hellhole that it is, that wasteland that Gaza is right now, with unexploded ordnance, with debris everywhere, with no sewage, with no water. And — and President Trump has — has put forward a plan to deal with the practical reality that is 1.8 million Gazans now — now truly suffering.
And then, you know, just to bring it back to our own hemisphere, we’ve seen literally, in the last month — after years of national security experts, the generals in charge, and others testifying and ringing the alarm bells about — about the Chinese Communist Party’s presence in our own hemisphere, particularly in the Panama Canal, we’re seeing the leadership of Panama step away from the Belt and Road program, move away from China and back towards the United States, and even enter into talks and — and other negotiations about addressing the ports on either side of the canal.
And then, finally, last but not least, we’ve had four world leaders in the White House, in the Oval Office. We’ve had the prime minister of Japan, the prime minister of India, the king of — of Jordan, and, of course, the prime minister of Israel just in the last four weeks. And next week, we’ll have the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and we’ll have the president of France, Macron.
So, President Trump is on what we call Trump warp speed. We are all — we are all honored to be really serving under — under his leadership and his vision. And truly, you know, when we all say — and the President himself say — says, he is a president of peace. He is a president focused on restoring stability. I think the entire world saw what the world would look like without strong American leadership in the last four years.
And it’s truly been an honor to get us back to where we were and back on track under President Trump’s leadership.
MS. LEAVITT: Thank you, Mike.
MR. WALTZ: Mm-hmm.
MS. LEAVITT: Thank you. Thank you, everybody. I’m sure you’re very eager to ask questions of these very smart people working very hard on behalf of the president.
We do have somebody in our new media seat today. We have John Stoll, who is the head of news at X. As you all know — you’re all on X — it’s home to hundreds of millions of users, a large contingent of independent journalists and news organizations across geographies and political spectrums. And at the same time, X remains the go-to platform for many legacy news outlets. And I know, as I mentioned, many of the reporters in this room use X to attract eyeballs to your work.
Prior to joining X, John spent two decades in journalism, including several years as an editor at The Wall Street Journal. We are excited to have him in the briefing room today.
John, we’ll let you kick it off. And as I said at the top, please direct your question to the individual up here who you’d like an answer from.
John, why don’t you begin.
Q All right. Thank you very much. I am sitting in for a thriving ecosystem of journalists, independent and — and emerging news organizations who do depend on X for publicity, for a business model. And so, I look forward to seeing many of them in this seat in months and years to come.
I also thank you, Karoline, for opening this seat up to new media. It — it really is a testament not only to your open-mindedness but also to innovation that you’d actually think about, you know, folks that are not traditionally credentialed to be in this room to be in this room and to not only have a question but also to witness — you know, this is at a very important intersection of power and the free press.
And so, just the ability to witness this and — and be part of it, it brings everybody’s game up. So, thank you for that.
I think this is for Mike Waltz. My question is about Ukraine.
MR. WALTZ: Sure.
Q For about more than 10 years, I’ve been fascinated, like all — like many, with what’s going on. I was in Northern Europe working out of the Baltics when Crimea was annexed and was — a lot — a lot of this came on Twitter. The platform used to be known as Twitter. Was — a lot of European leaders would — would talk about their disappointment and — and solidarity with Ukraine, but when it came to actually doing something, it felt like they were passing a hot potato and sent it over the Atlantic.
I wonder how much of what we’re seeing right now out of the administration and President Trump is a call to Europe and the European leaders and allies that we’ve traditionally had to pick up that hot potato and — and start doing something a little bit more concrete to win and preserve the peace in Ukraine.
The second question I have is — it — it’s related — is there’s been some — a lot of speculation that President Trump and the administration might be manipulated by Pre- — by Vladimir Putin. I wonder if you can just talk a little bit about the administration’s posture —
MR. WALTZ: Yeah.
Q — and your confidence in the competence of this administration to d- — go toe to toe with Vladimir Putin.
MR. WALTZ: Well, if there’s an- — I’ll take the l- — second question first. If there’s anybody in this world that can go toe to toe with Putin, that could go toe to toe with Xi, that could go toe to toe with Kim Jong Un — and we could keep going down the list — it’s Donald J. Trump. He is the dealmaker in chief. There is no question that he is the commander in chief.
And I, for one — and I think all Americans and around the world should have no doubt about his ability to not only handle Putin but to handle the complexity of driving this war to an end.
And then on your first piece on Europe, I’ll take you back to 2014. You’re right. There was a lot of hand-wringing in Europe and not a lot of action. There was also a lot of hand-wringing here in Washington under the Obama administration and not a lot of action. They literally threw blankets at the problem.
And so, I’ll remind everyone that Putin had, you know, some type of conflict, invasion, or issue with their neighbor under President Bush, with Georgia; under President Obama, with Ukraine in 2014; not under President Trump, 45; and again with President Biden in 2022. The war should have been deterred. The war should have never happened, and I have no doubt it would not have happened under President Trump and will stop under President — President Trump again.
But I just want to push back on this notion of our European allies not being consulted as we’ve entered into this process. I already mentioned the immediate phone call President Trump made to President Zelenskyy. He has talked to President Macron of France repeatedly last week. President Macron convened European leaders and then is coming here on Monday. Prime Minister Starmer is coming next Thursday.
We’ve also — I’ve talked to every one of my national security — national security advisor counterparts across — across the spectrum in Europe. I’ve talked to Secretary-General Rutte, the — the leader of NATO, the secretary-general of NATO. We have repeatedly — oh, by the way, we had half our Cabinet — seven Cabinet officials, including the vice president, at the Munich Security Conference, all engaging, all listening, and all making sure our allies were heard.
However, we’ve also made it clear for years — decades, even — that it is unacceptable that the United States and the United States taxpayer continues to bear the burden not only of the cost of the war in Ukraine but of the defense of — of Europe. We fully support our NATO Allies. We fully support the Article 5 commitment. But it’s time for our European allies to step up.
And one of the things that Secretary-General Rutte said on our call was this last couple of weeks have been a real wake-up call. And I asked him, “What have you been missing the last couple of years?”
The fact that we are going to enter into a NATO summit this June with a third of our NATO Allies still not meeting the 2 percent minimum, a commitment they made a decade ago — literally a decade ago — with a war on their doorstep — the largest war that they’re all extremely concerned about — but yet it’s “Well, somebody else needs to pay. We’ve got other domestic priorities.” It’s unacceptable. President Trump has made that clear.
And the minimum needs to be met. We need to be at 100 percent in — this June at the NATO summit. And then let’s talk about exceeding it, which what — is what President Trump has been talking about, with 5 percent of GDP.
Europe needs to step up for their own defense as a partner. And we can be friends and allies and have those tough conversations.
MS. LEAVITT: Great. Peter.
Q Thank you, Karoline. I have a Ukraine one and a DOGE one. Who can talk DOGE?
MS. LEAVITT: Stephen, go ahead.
Q Well, so — so, Stephen, we’re hearing about these DOGE dividend checks that would be 20 percent back to taxpayers, 20 percent to pay down the debt. Sixty percent is left. Who gets that?
MR. MILLER: Well, the way that it works is when you achieve savings, you can either return it to taxpayers, you can return it to our debtors, or it can be cycled into next year’s budget, and then it just lowers the overall baseline for next year. So, in other words, you can just transfer it into the next fiscal window and then lower the overall spending level. And that means that you can achieve a permanent savings that way, and that reduces the deficit.
Q And when is it that people might see those checks?
MR. MILLER: Well, this is all going to be worked on through the reconciliation process with Congress that’s going underway right now, as you’ve seen. The Senate is moving a bill. The House is moving a bill. The president has great confidence in both chambers to deliver on his priorities.
I would just take this opportunity to note that President Trump has made a historic commitment to the working class of this country to fight for a major tax relief and major price relief. And cutting spending, as DOGE is doing, and cutting taxes is the key to delivering on both of those promises. And President Trump is resolutely committed to doing both.
Q Thank you. And on Ukraine. I guess, this is for Mike.
MR. WALTZ: Sure.
Q After the president’s post on Truth Social yesterday, need to know: Who does he think is more responsible for the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Putin or Zelenskyy?
MR. WALTZ: Well, look, his — his goal, Peter, is to bring this war to an end, period. And there has been ongoing fighting on both sides. It is World War I-style trench warfare.
His frustration with President Zelenskyy is — that you’ve heard — is multifold. One, there needs to be a deep appreciation for what the American people, what the American taxpayer, what President Trump did in — in his first term, and what we’ve done since. So, some of the rhetoric coming out of Kyiv, frankly, and — and insults to President Trump were unacceptable. Number one.
Number two, our own secretary of Treasury personally made the trip to offer the Ukrainians what is — can only be described as a historic opportunity — that is for America to coinvest with Ukraine in their minerals, in their resources, to truly grow the pie.
So, case in point, there’s a foundry that processes aluminum in Ukraine. It’s — it’s been damaged. It’s not at its current capacity. If that is restored, it would account for America’s entire imports of aluminum for an entire year — that one foundry.
There are tremendous resources there. Not only is that long-term security for Ukraine, not only do we help them grow the pie with investments, but, you know, we do have an obligation to the American taxpayer in helping them recoup the hundreds of billions that ha- — that have occurred.
So, you know, rather than enter — enter into some constructive conversations about what that deal should be going forward, we got a lot of rhetoric in the media that was — that was incredibly unfortunate.
And I could just tell you, Peter, you know, as a veteran, as somebody who’s been in combat, this war is horrific. And I think we’ve lost sight of that, of the literally thousands of people that are dying a day, families that are going without the next generation.
And I find it kind of, you know, frankly, ridiculous. So many people in Washington that were just demanding, pounding the table for a ceasefire in Gaza are suddenly aghast that the president would demand one and both sides come to the table when it talks to — when it comes to Ukraine, a war that has been arguably far greater in — in scope and scale and far more dangerous in terms of global escalation to U.S. security.
Q And I do have one for Karoline.
MS. LEAVITT: Sure.
Q Does President Trump have a bet with Trudeau about this USA-Canada hockey game tonight? (Laughter.) And when there is a big hockey game on, is the president watching for the goals or for the fights?
MS. LEAVITT: (Laughs.) Probably both. I think he’s watching for the United States to win tonight. I know he talked to the USA hockey team this morning. He talked to the players after their morning practice, around 10 o’clock. And I also spoke to some folks from that team after. They were jubilant over President Trump’s comments to the team. I believe they’re going to put out a video of that call.
So, he looks forward to watching the game tonight, and we look forward to the United States beating our soon-to-be 51st state, Canada. (Laughter.)
Bloomberg, go ahead.
Q My question is for Mike Waltz. Can you give us a readout of Kellogg’s meeting with Zelenskyy that just wrapped up? And, in particular, Zelenskyy publicly rejected this deal about the rare earth minerals. Where — where does that stand?
MR. WALTZ: Well, we’re going to continue to have — he needs to come back to the table, and we’re going to continue to have discussions about where that deal is going.
Again, we have an obligation to the taxpayer. I think this is an opportunity. The president thinks this is an opportunity for Ukraine going forward. There can be, in my view, nothing better for Ukraine’s future and for their security than — than to have the United States invested in their prosperity long-term. And then a key piece of this has also been security guarantees.
Look, the — the reality that we’re talking about here is: Is it in Ukraine’s interest? Is it in Europe’s interest? It certainly isn’t in Russia’s interest or in the American people’s interest for this war to grind on forever and ever and ever.
So, a key part of his conversation was helping President Zelenskyy understand this war needs to come to an end. This kind of open-ended mantra that we’ve had under the Biden administration, that’s over. And I think a lot of people are having a hard time accepting that.
And then the other piece is there’s been discussions from Prime Minister Starmer and also President Macron about European-led security guarantees. We welcome that. We’ve been asking Europe to step up and secure its own prosperity, safety, and security. So, we certainly welcome that.
And we certainly welcome more European assistance. As I told my counterparts, “Come to the table with more, if — if you want a bigger seat at the table.” And we’ve been asking for that for quite some time.
Q And has Russia pushed for sanctions in your talks with them? And have you consulted with international partners and allies about potentially rolling back sanctions in these negotiations to end the war?
MR. WALTZ: Those — the talks with — with our Russian counterparts — both with my counterpart, the national security advisor; Secretary Rubio’s counterpart, the Foreign Minister, Foreign Minister Lavrov — you know, it — it really were — was quite broad, focused on what is the goals for our broader relationship, but very clear that the fighting has to stop to get to any of those brighter goals.
And as a first step, we’re just going to do some commonsense things, like restore the — the ability of both of our embassies to function.
And, again, you know, this is — this was common sense. In — in foreign policy world, they call it “shuttle diplomacy.” We have to talk to both sides in order to get to both sides to the table, and both sides have said only President Trump could do that.
MS. LEAVITT: Diana.
Q Thank you. And my question is for Mike Waltz. (Laughter.)
MR. WALTZ: All right.
Q The president has called Zelenskyy a dictator. Does he view Putin as a dictator?
And does he want Zelenskyy out of power? I know he’s called for elections.
And then, thirdly, the head of the Defense Committee in Ukraine’s parliament just has claimed that the U.S. has stopped selling weapons to Ukraine. Is that true?
MR. WALTZ: Well, most of our weapons that have gone to Ukraine have been part of a drawdown authority, where we’ve literally taken them out of our stocks and then, eventually, through appropriations, started buying them again to refill our stocks.
I’ll, you know, just state that there has been a lag in a lot of that process. So, many of our stocks, as we look at our operations around the world, are becoming more depleted. That’s one of the reasons many people have had a lot of concern about: When does this end? How much is it going to take? How many lives will be lost? How much will we be — how much will we spend?
As a member of Congress, we repeatedly asked the Biden administration those questions, and we never got a satisfactory answer.
Look, President Trump is obviously very frustrated right now with President Zelenskyy — the fact that — that he hasn’t come to the table, that he hasn’t been willing to take this opportunity that we have offered. I think he eventually will get to that point, and I hope so very quickly.
But President Trump is — as we made clear to our Russian counterparts, and I want to make clear today — he’s focused on stopping the fighting and moving forward. And we could argue all day long about what’s happened in the past.
MS. LEAVITT: Reagan.
Q Thanks. I have a question for Stephen —
(Cross-talk.)
Q — and a question for Mike.
MS. LEAVITT: Excuse me, I just called on Reagan. Reagan, go ahead.
Q I have a question for Stephen and a question for Mike.
MS. LEAVITT: Sure.
Q Stephen, I can start with you. There have been reports —
MR. MILLER: Thank you.
Q — that Trump is unhappy with the rate of deportations and he wants them to be higher. Is the president happy with the rate of deportations, and are there any plans to speed up the process?
MR. MILLER: Well, first of all, we all appreciate the encouragement from the media to deport as many illegal aliens as humanly possible. So, thank you.
And I will promise you that the full might of the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, the Department of Defense, and every element and instrument of national power will be used to remove, with speed, all criminal illegals from the soil of the United States of America, to enforce final removal orders, and to ensure that this country is for American citizens and those who legally belong in this country.
We inherited an ICE that was completely shuttered. We inherited a Department of Homeland Security whose sole mission was to resettle illegal aliens within the United States of America.
In 30 days, the president sealed the border shut, declared the cartels to be terrorist organizations, has increased ICE deportations to levels not seen in decades, and we are shortly on the verge of achieving a pace and speed of deportations this country has never before seen.
Thank you.
Q And Mike.
MR. WALTZ: Mm-hmm.
Q There have been reports that there’s some underground opposition to Trump’s pick for Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Elbridge Colby. Have you or anyone from the administration been personally lobbying senators to support Elbridge Colby?
MR. WALTZ: Look, I’ve worked with Bridge Co- — Colby in the past. He has the president’s full support to be the Undersecretary of policy, which will be a critical policy arm for Secretary Hegseth going forward that will implement a lot of these policies.
And — and really, that’s — that’s been the extent of it. I think there’s been a lot of kind of, you know, breathless — I don’t know — back-and-forth in the — in the press, but we’re full speed ahead to get the president’s team in place so we can implement his America First policy.
MS. LEAVITT: Thank you. Mike has spoken pretty extensively. Does anybody have questions for Stephen or for Mr. Hassett?
Q I do.
MS. LEAVITT: Nobody wants to talk about the economy? (Laughter.)
(Cross-talk.)
MS. LEAVITT: Sure.
Q IRS.
MS. LEAVITT: IRS. Okay. Go ahead.
Q And this would be for either one of you. So, we have reported, several other outlets have reported that about 3,500 people are due to be — lose their jobs at the IRS by the end of the week. If the goal of these spending cuts across the federal government has been to reduce the debt, why impose some of the deepest cuts we’ve seen so far at the agency responsible for raising revenue for the federal government?
MR. HASSETT: Well, I think our objective is to make sure that the employees that we pay are being productive and effective. And there are many, many — more than 100,000 people working to collect taxes, and not all of them are fully occupied. And the Treasury secretary is studying the matter and feels like 3,500 is a small number and probably can get bigger, especially as we improve the IT at the IRS.
And so — so, I think that it’s absolutely something that is on the table for good reasons. And the point is that — don’t just talk about the IRS. Talk about all of government, that there are so many places — I live in D.C.; you maybe live in D.C. — where you never — there — nobody — nobody is going into the buildings. People aren’t commuting because nobody is doing their job. We look back and we see that there are all these people doing two jobs while they’re getting a government payroll — on the payroll.
So, the point is, we’re fixing that, and the IRS is a small part of that picture.
Q So, you’re saying that everybody who’s being let go was doing a bad job?
MR. HASSETT: I’m saying that we’re studying every agency and deciding who to let go and why, and we’re doing so very rationally with a lot of support from analysis.
Q Because we’re being told by a lot of people who have been let go at other agencies that they were told they were being dismissed because of poor performance, when, in some cases, they haven’t even had a performance review yet because they’ve only been on the job a couple of months.
MR. HASSETT: Yeah, I’ve never seen a person who was laid off for poor performance say that they were performing poorly. (Laughter.) Okay?
Q Karoline.
MS. LEAVITT: Good point. Sure, Kaitlan.
Q I have a question. I’ll start with you, Kevin Hassett. Thank you for being here. And then I’ve got a question for Mr. Waltz.
On these potential checks that you might send out from DOGE, is there a concern, as you’re thinking through this, that they could be inflationary?
MR. HASSETT: Oh, absolutely not, because imagine if we don’t spend government money and we give it back to people, then the — you know, if they spend it all, then you’re even. But they’re probably going to save a lot of it, in which case, you’re reducing inflation.
Q Okay. So, you’re not —
MR. HASSETT: And also, when the government spends a lot, that’s what creates inflation. We learned that from Joe Biden. And so, if we reduce government spending, then that’s — you know, reduces inflation. And if you give people money, then they’re going to save a bunch of it. And — and when they save it, then that also reduces demand and reduces inflation.
Q Okay. So, you’re not worried about it.
MR. HASSETT: No, I’m not.
Q And, Mr. Waltz, to follow up on Peter’s question, you wrote in an op-ed in the fall of 2023 that, quote, “Putin is to blame, certainly, like al Qaeda was to blame for 9/11.”
MR. WALTZ: Mm-hmm.
Q Do you still feel that way now, or do you share the president’s assessment, as he says Ukraine is to blame for the start of this war?
MR. WALTZ: Well, it shouldn’t surprise you that I share the president’s assessment on all kinds of issues. What I wrote as a Member of Congress is — was as a former Member of Congress.
Look, what I share the president’s assessment on is that the war has to end. And what comes with that? What comes with that should be, at some point, elections. What comes with that should be peace. What comes with that is prosperity that we’ve just offered in this natural resources and economic partnership arrangement: an end to the killing and European security and security for the world. The President is not only determined to do that in Europe, he’s determined to do it in the Middle East.
And just a few months ago, we had an administration that had tried for 15 months, week after week, sitting with you here, and couldn’t get us to a ceasefire, couldn’t get our hostages out. Now we’re at that point. We’re back to the maximum pressure on Iran.
And we will — we have just begun, and we will drive towards a ceasefire and all of those other steps. I’m not going to pre-negotiate or get ahead of the sequencing of all of that. It’s a very delicate situation.
But this is a president of peace. And who here would argue against peace?
Q Okay. So, you do share that assessment.
And can I follow up. In 2017 —
MS. LEAVITT: No. Go ahead, Jordan.
Q — then-President Trump —
MS. LEAVITT: Go ahead, Jordan.
Q Can I just follow up really quickly?
Q Thank you. So —
MS. LEAVITT: You just had two questions, Kaitlan.
Q May I — can I just —
MS. LEAVITT: Jordan, go ahead.
Q Mr. — Mr. Hassett —
MS. LEAVITT: Thank you.
Q I have an important follow-up for Mike Waltz.
MS. LEAVITT: Jordan, go ahead. Go ahead.
Q So, Mr. Hassett, you were speaking about tariff revenue, and you also addressed a question about the R- — IRS. President Trump has spoken about replacing income tax with tariff revenue, especially with all this waste, fraud, and abuse that we’re seeing cut. Is that a possibility?
MR. HASSETT: Absolutely. And, in fact, if you think about the China tariff revenue that we’re estimating is coming in from the 10 percent that we just added, plus the de minimis thing, that it’s between $500 billion and a trillion dollars over 10 years, is our estimate. And that’s something that is outside of the reductions that markets are seeing through the negotiations up on the Hill.
And so, we expect that the tariff revenue is actually going to make it much easier for Republicans to pass a bill, and that was the President’s plan all along.
Thank you.
Q And I — I have a question for Stephen Miller about DOGE. So, you — you spoke about DOGE. You said roughly $50 billion is set to be cut in a year of waste, fraud, and abuse by unelected bureaucrats. We’re hearing this ironic narrative from the President’s critics and the left-wing media that Elon Musk is an unelected bureaucrat, and he’s doing all this terrible stuff. Isn’t one of DOGE’s objectives to get — get rid of the federal bureaucracy, the — the deep state? And also, who was running the White House when Joe Biden was in office —
MR. MILLER: (Laughs.)
Q — because I don’t know a single person who believes it was Joe Biden?
MR. MILLER: Yes. You’re — you’re tempting me to say — (laughs) — some very harsh things about some of our media friends. The — yes, it is true that many of the people in this room, for four years, failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent and was not running the country.
It is also true that many people in this room who have used this talking point that Elon is not elected fail to understand how government works. So, I’m glad for the opportunity for a brief civics lesson.
A president is elected by the whole American people. He’s the only official in the entire government that is elected by the entire nation. Right? Judges are appointed. Members of Congress are elected at the district or state level. Just one man.
And the Constitution, Article Two, has a clause, known as the vesting clause, and it says, “The executive power shall be vested in a president,” singular. The whole will of democracy is imbued into the elected president. That president then appoints staff to then impose that democratic will onto the government.
The threat to democracy — indeed, the existential threat to democracy — is the unelected bureaucracy of lifetime, tenured civil servants who believe they answer to no one, who believe they can do whatever they want without consequence, who believe they can set their own agenda no matter what Americans vote for.
So, Americans vote for radical FBI reform, and FBI agents say they don’t want to change. Or Americans vote for radical reform in our energy policies, but EPA bureaucrats say they don’t want to change. Or Americans vote to end DEI — racist DEI policies, and lawyers in the Department of Justice say they don’t want to change.
What President Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people.
Thank you.
Q Thanks, Stephen. Can I follow up?
Q Karoline.
MS. LEAVITT: Thank you very much, everybody. I’m looking at the clock. We’ve almost had an hour of time.
(Cross-talk.)
LEAVITT: I know a couple of these individuals have a meeting to get to at 2:00 p.m. So, you’re welcome to follow up with my team for further questions. We’re going to let these guys get back to running the United States government.
And we will see you all later. President Trump will be speaking at 3 o’clock at the Black History Month reception.
So, thank you. It’s good to see you. We’ll see you in a bit. Thanks.
Q Are you going to the Black History Month reception, Mr. Miller?
Q Stephen, on the fraud. Should we expect indictments?
Q What is your reaction to Mitch McConnell’s retirement?
Q Are there indictments coming for all the fraud we’ve found?
MR. MILLER: I’d love to follow up with you. Just set up a time with Karoline.
Q Okay. Thank you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12ddd/12ddddb2d7d5f5c3cfc8494b70d0932818798c49" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db604/db6040395bf182030f7b3256c75a436a86ae9a2e" alt=""