Devin Nunes responds to loony Swalwell interview and NAILS the heck out of it!

This morning we showed you the ridiculous interview with Rep. Swalwell, who claims the phony dossier is ‘factual’ and still believes Trump is a Russian agent.
I’m confident that if there were another jihadist attack, Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., would be right there with his fellow Democrats, demanding more legal rights for enemy combatants while his fellow progressive lawyers queued up from Harvard Yard to Guantanamo Bay to volunteer their services to those who’d been detained. After all, as they’ve told us for years, due process for the enemy is part of “our values” – it’s “who we are.”
Devin Nunes went on right after Swalwell and responded to his comments. And I have to say, he nails is pretty good.
Nunes actually calls Swalwell a ‘chupacabra hunter’! That’s so perfect, LOL!
Here’s more of what he said via the Daily Caller:
“No, I actually think you should just give him the entire show because the American people will see what they voted for,” Nunes said before comparing the search for a “Russian ghost somewhere” with “trying to find a chupacabra,” a mythical animal.
“They are like a bunch of chupacabra hunters,” he continued. “They have never seen it. They’ve never had any evidence. They said they have more than a circumstantial evidence. They said they have direct evidence. The truth of the matter is the people who colluded with the Russians were the Democrats. The Democrats paid Christopher Steele, a former British spy, to get dirt on Trump from Russia. That is just a fact.”
He’s exactly right and we’ve known this for a long time now. The only chupacabra is Hillary Clinton and the DNC, because they colluded with the Russians!
Yet Democrats and the media could care less about the actual collusion. Which just proves once again how this whole affair is exactly what Trump has said it was so many times: a witch hunt.

Read More Add your Comment 0 nhận xét

UNBELIEVABLE: Rachel Maddow’s ratings PLUMMETED after Mueller Report!

Rachel Maddow shows a pattern in behavior by the Trump administration of making dramatic announcements without following through to make sure the thing they announced ends up being real, and expresses caution about the announcement of the Mueller report happening without actually sharing the Mueller report.

There may still be hope for America yet.
Rachel Maddow, who was crying Friday night after initial reports showed that Trump had been vindicated by the Mueller investigation, was more than likely crying yesterday when her ratings came in for Monday night.
According to the Daily Beast, they plummeted:
Here’s more:
Within MSNBC, there’s an acknowledgement that the Trump-Russia narrative on which the cable network—and especially its primetime star Maddow—built monster ratings has fizzled for the moment.
Insiders also claim not to be surprised that the conclusion of the long-awaited Mueller report—or at least the Trump-appointed attorney general’s summary—was a whimper, not a bang for an outlet that has invested so much time and energy, in primetime and throughout its dayparts, in the notion that Trump is unworthy of the Oval Office and might at some point be forced to give it up.
And it’s also possible that the Mueller disappointment drove loyal viewers away in much the same way that people avoid looking at their 401(k)s when the stock market is down. Maddow, who has consistently vied for the first or second top-rated cable news program, was sixth on Monday evening, down almost 500,000 total viewers from the previous Monday, as was MSNBC’s second top-rated program in primetime, The Last Word With Lawrence O’Donnell.
500,000 is a big chunk of viewers!
I can only hope that trend continues now that the truth is out. The media had vilified Trump to the point of ‘treason’ and now narrative is dead.
But don’t worry about MSNBC. They say they aren’t panicking yet…
Conversely, “It was obviously a big couple of nights for Fox,” said one network insider, claiming, however, that nobody at MSNBC is panicking.
I’ll be looking forward to Tuesday night to see if the trend continues. I’m crossing my fingers!

Read More Add your Comment 0 nhận xét

Katy Tur calls out Sen Hirono for trying to have it BOTH WAYS on Green New Deal

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) joins MTP Daily to discuss Democrats pivoting to health care after the Mueller report memo and what their strategy is going forward. Trump health care equals ‘big fat zeroes’

The despicable Senator Hirono from Hawaii was on MSNBC trying to explain why Democrats refused to vote for the Green New Deal.
Of course she called the vote by McConnell a sham and said Democrats didn’t want to participate.
But then something happened that I wasn’t expecting.
MSNBC Katy Tur challenges Hirono, accusing her of trying to appear to support the bill without having to suffer for it politically.
I love it.
Hirono makes the argument to support the Green New Deal and then Tur flips it right back on her and asks why not vote for it anyway if she believes in it:
But isn’t that an argument that you just made to vote ‘yes’ for it. I mean McConnell may be trying to make it a show vote… You’ve signed onto this, you’re one of the co-authors of it. If you believe that this is something – even if it’s aspirational – that needs to get done, why not take a stand and vote YES for it, [saying] ‘here’s where the Democrats stand on it’ and ‘we don’t don’t care that it’s a show vote from Leader McConnell.’
It seems like you’re trying to have it both ways – not be hung by it politically but also NOT say that you don’t support it.
Wow, great point. I’m kinda surprised she made it.
Yet Hirono was undeterred and just went back to jibber-jabbering about how it’s a shame and McConnell’s trying to divide Democrats.
Blah blah blah.

Read More Add your Comment 0 nhận xét

Jusuf Nurkic comes down awkwardly and suffers a devastating Gordon Hayward-like injury.

GRAPHIC CONTENT WARNING: Jusuf Nurkic comes down awkwardly and suffers a devastating Gordon Hayward-like injury.

Read More Add your Comment 0 nhận xét

Hình Học 9 - HKII - VĨnh Lộc A

Cho (O;R) và một điểm S nằm ngoài đường tròn. Kẻ tiếp tuyến SA với (O) (A là tiếp điểm) và cát tuyến SCD (SD>SC).
a)    Chứng minh: SA2=SC.SD
b)    Đường thẳng qua A và vuông góc với SO tại I cắt (O) tại B. Chứng minh SC.SD=SI.SO và SB là tiếp tuyến của (O).
c)     Gọi F là trung điểm CD; OF cắt AB tại T. Chứng minh 4 điểm T,F,I,S cùng thuộc một đường tròn.
d)    Chứng minh: TC2=TF.TO và TC là tiếp tuyến của O.

Ta có:
Tứ giác TFIS nội tiếp (chứng minh trên)
=>OF.OT=OI.OS (tự chứng minh)
Lại có: OI.OS=AO2=R2
Mà : hai tam giác CTF và CTO có chung góc T
Suy ra: tam giác CTF đồng dạng với OTC
=>TC2 =TF.TO và TCOC (vì F=C=90o là hai góc tương ứng)
Mà đề cho C thuộc (O) nên TC là tiếp tuyến của (O).

Read More Add your Comment 1 nhận xét

Hillary Clinton says: 'I'm not running' for president in 2020

"I'm not running, but I'm going to keep on working and speaking and standing up for what I believe," Clinton told the station, in the first local television interview since the midterm elections. Clinton also said she is "not going anywhere."

"What's at stake in our country, the kind of things that are happening right now are deeply troubling to me. And I'm also thinking hard about how do we start talking and listening to each other again?" she said. "We've just gotten so polarized. We've gotten into really opposing camps unlike anything I've ever seen in my adult life."

Read More Add your Comment 1 nhận xét

Hướng dẫn giải Hóa 10 - Áp dụng bảo toàn điện tích

Bài 6: cho m g hỗn hợp X gồm Mg, Al, Zn tác dụng vừa đủ với 6,72 lít khí Clo (đktc). Mặc khác , hòa tan hoàn toàn m gam X trên bằng dung dịch HCl dư thấy thoát ra V lít khí (đktc). Tính V.

 ở đây ta lưu ý hỗn hộp X là 3 chất mà chỉ có 1 mức oxi hóa dù phản ứng với clo hay HCl, nên ta có:
Cl2 +2e --> 2Cl-
HCl --> H2 +2Cl-
Vậy thể tích khí Hidro thu dược là 6,72 lít.
Lưu ý: ta có thể suy nghĩ theo các hướng sau:
ü Bảo toàn mol e
ü Bảo toàn điện tích
ü Số mol e kim loại cho = số mol Cl- trong muối
ü Bảo toàn mol nguyên tố
Hãy chọn một cách suy nghỉ mà mình có thể hiểu.

Read More Add your Comment 0 nhận xét

Michelle Malkin doesn’t pull ANY punches in feisty CPAC speech!

I haven’t been able to watch hardly any of the CPAC 2019 speeches, but regardless of that I’m going to go out on a limb and say that if there’s just one CPAC speech you need to watch, it’s this one.

I am not overstating this. This is the kind of speech CPAC was designed for!


Michelle Malkin didn’t pull any punches from those who are doing harm to our country via terrible immigration policies, whether it be Democrats or Republicans.

She also called out those who silence conservatives and naming names, even taking a shot at CPAC itself for doing this in the past.

And Van Jones, who’s getting kudos this week for praising Republicans yesterday at CPAC – well she made sure to remind everyone of how his group, Color of Change, has been part of the hard left working against conservative policies and silencing conservatives.

I can’t go through everything she talked about, but the main focus of her speech was on immigration. She wanted to ensure that it got more than just one 20 minute discussion. The latter portion of her speech focused on how important conservative activism really is and how that’s the only way things are truly going to change.

After watching the whole speech, I’m left with the feeling that it’s time to restart the Tea Party all over again and make sure the amnesty lovers on the right don’t take it over this time.

Seriously, watch her speech.

Read More Add your Comment 0 nhận xét

Tìm tham số m lớp 10 của Quỳnh

Câu 6: cho phương trình 2x2+2mx+m2-2=0, với m là tham số, gọi x1, x2 là hai nghiệm của phương trình. Tìm giá trị lớn nhất của biểu thức: A=|2x1.x2+x1+x2-4|
Ta có Δ’=m2-2.(m2-2)=4-m2.
ð Để phương trình có nghiệm phân biệt thì 4-m2 >0
ð -2<m<2
Khi đó theo Vi-et:
ü S=x1+x2=-b/a= -m
ü P=x1.x2=c/a=(m2-2)/2
Thay vào biểu thức ta được:
A=|2.(m2-2)/2 -m-4|=|m2-m-6|
Đặt f(x)=m2-m-6=(m-1/2)2-25/4 ≥ -25/4
Ta xét thêm các giá trị đặt biệt: f(-2)=0, f(2)=-4
Do A=|f(x)| nên lấy các giá trị trên đưa về giá trị dương ta được giá trị lớn nhất là 25/4.
(ở đây T làm theo quy trình bản chất -2<m<2, không có dấu bằng nên không cần xét 2 vị trí này cũng được).
Lưu ý: A=|f(x)| thì A lớn nhất khi f(x) lớn nhất ở giá trị dương hoặc f(x) nhỏ nhất ở giá trị âm, dựa vào câu này để suy luận nhé.
Câu 7: cho phương trình 2x2-2mx+m2-2=0, với m là tham số.
a.     Tình m để phương trình có hai nghiệm dương phân biệt
b.    Giả sử phương trình có 2 nghiệm không âm, tìm nghiệm dương lớn nhất của phương trình.
Để phương trình có hai nghiệm phân biệt thì: Δ’>0
=>4-m2>0 =>-2<m<2
Vì đề yêu cầu hai nghiệm dương thì:
ü S=x1+x2=-b/a=m >0
ü P=x1.x2=c/a=(m2-2)/2 >0 => m>2 v m<-√2  (√ là căn)
Giao với điều kiện delta =>2 <m <2
Phần quang trọng tìm nghiệm lớn nhất.
Ta có: 2x2-2mx+m2-2=0
ở đây ta coi m là biến còn x là tham số, ta sẽ tìm điều kiện của x để phương trình có nghiệm m. (cách này gọi là đổi biến)
Để phương trình có nghiệm m thì
Δ0 => 2-x20
=>-√2x≤√2  (√ là căn)
Vậy x lớn nhất là √2.

Read More Add your Comment 0 nhận xét


© 2012 Học Để ThiBlog tài liệu