GOP Representative Dan Crenshaw of Texas outlined his vision for a sustainable peace in Ukraine during his recent interview on “Face the Nation” with Margaret Brennan. Speaking from the Munich Security Conference after meeting Ukrainian President Zelenskyy and fellow lawmakers, Crenshaw emphasized that Ukraine’s future hinges not only on ongoing military support but also on firm security assurances integrated into any peace agreement.

A Path Toward Enduring Peace

Crenshaw made it clear that a lasting peace for Ukraine involves more than merely ending hostilities—it requires concrete security guarantees. He referenced General Kellogg, the Special Envoy leading the peace initiative, who stressed the importance of defining what security assurances should look like. According to Crenshaw, even Ukrainian leaders are actively discussing these details, which underlines the complexity and necessity of comprehensive negotiations.

The Urgent Need for European Leadership

A central theme in Crenshaw’s message was the call for European nations to take a more proactive and aggressive role in the conflict. “If you want a seat at the table, you need to be uncomfortably aggressive,” he asserted, arguing that Europe should not only match but exceed U.S. contributions. Given that Europe is directly impacted by Russian actions, Crenshaw contends that European leaders must significantly boost their military and financial support—potentially doubling or tripling their efforts—to shift the balance of power and strengthen the negotiating position against Vladimir Putin.

Negotiating with Putin: Power and Pragmatism

When addressing the contentious issue of engaging with Putin, Crenshaw maintained that no option should be ruled out during negotiations. He stressed that Putin responds only to power, advocating for a “carrot and stick” approach. While some officials have voiced concerns about setting preconditions (such as limiting Ukraine’s NATO aspirations or redrawing its borders), Crenshaw insists that keeping all options on the table is crucial. He pointed to former President Trump’s readiness to use every available lever—both economic and military—to ensure that negotiations are robust and effective.

Lessons from Afghanistan and Domestic Priorities

Drawing parallels with past foreign policy challenges, Crenshaw recalled the shortcomings in handling the aftermath of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan—particularly regarding the plight of those who had supported American efforts. Citing his own experience with the Afghan Adjustment Act, he emphasized the moral and strategic imperative to bring back allies who risked their lives alongside U.S. forces.

On the domestic front, Crenshaw also touched on the debate over U.S. defense spending. While America currently allocates about 3.4% of its GDP to defense, he expressed support for discussions on increasing this figure to 5%—a target promoted by President Trump. Such an increase, he argued, would not only reinforce America’s military readiness but also help maintain a strategic advantage in an increasingly complex global landscape.

In Conclusion

Crenshaw’s remarks paint a picture of a multifaceted strategy for resolving the crisis in Ukraine—one that calls for robust U.S. leadership combined with a significantly more assertive European response. His blueprint emphasizes that achieving lasting peace will require all parties to engage fully at the negotiating table, backed by the power to enforce real change. In his view, a unified approach—blending military might, diplomatic flexibility, and proactive European participation—is the key to deterring further aggression and ensuring a stable, secure future for Ukraine and the broader region.